Personal pronouns in technical writing

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nick O
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Writing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of personal pronouns in technical writing, particularly in the context of lab reports in an academic setting. Participants explore the implications of different writing styles, the influence of instructors on these styles, and the evolving conventions in technical writing.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration over a TA's requirement to avoid personal pronouns while maintaining an active voice, suggesting this creates an awkward writing style.
  • Another participant cites a textbook that argues for the use of personal pronouns in technical writing, noting that while it is discouraged, it can enhance clarity and directness.
  • Some participants question the rationale behind avoiding personal pronouns, suggesting it may be an outdated convention aimed at making writing appear more formal or scientific.
  • There are humorous suggestions about how to respond to the TA's requirements, including using ironic references to personal pronouns in unconventional ways.
  • Links to external resources are shared to provide further context on the topic of personal pronouns in technical writing.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the appropriateness of personal pronouns in technical writing. There are competing views on whether to adhere to traditional conventions or embrace a more modern, personal approach.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the conventions around personal pronouns may vary by discipline and instructor preferences, indicating a lack of uniformity in style guides.

Nick O
Messages
158
Reaction score
8
So, with the start of a new semester comes new labs, new instructors, new TAs, and new biases on technical writing style [STRIKE]that I must conform to[/STRIKE] to which I must conform. In particular, one of my TAs this semester wants lab reports written without any personal pronouns (including the editorial "we"), but in the active voice. Active with no personal pronouns... this sounds like an awkward style for lab reports.

Despite how important he said professional writing is, he gave us a lab assignment with major parts written in Comic Sans. This feels rather one-sided.

I recall from my Technical Writing textbook, and from trends in general, that the preferred style is moving more and more toward active voice with personal pronouns where they improve the flow of the document. Are there any reputable writing style guides for engineering and science that support this?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
My lab instructor recommended the book 'practical physics' by GL Squires, as a guide throughout the course.

In it, it says "students are often discouraged from using 'I' in their accounts. There seems to be no sensible reason for this. When you are describing an experiment you actually did, the 'I' style is a natural one and enables you to use the active voice which is simpler and more direct than the passive. However it must be admitted that nowadays few papers, even those describing experiments, are written in the first person. So if you want to be conventional, avoid it. But if you do use it, you will be in the company of Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, and Thompson, which, as Damon Runyon might have said, is by no means bad company at that."

Nevertheless, he still told us to avoid it...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Assuming your post isn't meant to be a joke, ask him for an example to imitate.

This sounds like the sort of nonsense up with which one should not be required to put.
 
I recommend listening to Bob Dole campaign speeches.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 2 people
BOAS: Thanks, I appreciate that passage. I'll probably append it to one of my lab reports, written in Comic Sans. I'll use the style he requested for the actual report though, because I kind of like getting points.

AlephZero: No joke. There is some irony in the situation, but the post is completely sincere.

Vanadium 50: Nick O finds this funny.
 
Nick O said:
AlephZero: No joke.

Well, if somebody tried that sort of nonsense on me, he would get reports with the maximum possible number of personal references, all denoted by 'The student formerly known as "I".'
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ha! I did consider at least putting [REDACTED] in place of all pronouns.

I'm writing the first lab report as a full-out IMRaD report complete with table of contents and abstract just for the heck of it. Given that the first lab was just a PSPICE primer (just a software exercise), I think the irony should be obvious.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
14K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K