PF PHOTO CONTEST - Icons (10/18-10/24)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZapperZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contest Photo
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a photo contest themed "icons," where participants are encouraged to submit photographs that represent recognizable landmarks or symbols associated with specific locations, cities, or countries. The conversation includes rules for submission, technical aspects of photo sharing, and personal anecdotes related to the theme.

Discussion Character

  • Contest-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant emphasizes the importance of including a recognizable landmark or symbol in their photo submission.
  • Another participant expresses frustration about the timing of the contest, noting they could have captured a notable landmark if they had known earlier.
  • A suggestion is made that the contest could benefit from a rule where the subject does not need to be identified, implying that true icons should be universally recognizable.
  • Several participants share their photo submissions and discuss the challenges of capturing iconic images, including technical issues with photo uploads.
  • One participant mentions the significance of the haka in New Zealand culture as an iconic representation.
  • Another participant shares a photo of the Chicago sign and discusses its iconic status, suggesting optimal conditions for capturing the image.
  • There are multiple mentions of wanting to participate in a guessing game related to the contest, with hints about locations in South America.
  • Concerns are raised about the adequacy of some submitted photos in meeting the contest theme.
  • One participant notes they have no suitable "icon" pictures in their collection, indicating a struggle with the contest theme.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions about what constitutes an icon, with some suggesting that certain images may not be universally recognizable. There is no clear consensus on the necessity of identifying the subject of the photos, and several participants share differing views on their submissions and the contest rules.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention technical difficulties with photo uploads and sharing, indicating a potential barrier to participation. Additionally, there are references to personal experiences and preferences that may influence the selection of submitted images.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in photography, cultural icons, and community contests may find this discussion relevant and engaging.

  • #31
Integral said:
Nice ligthhouse but we have a disagreement about "most photgraphed"
http://www.hecetalighthouse.com/" Oregon's Hecta Head Ligthhouse is in running for this honor.

Could be! It seems like every popular lighthouse is touted as the "most photographed lighthouse" :biggrin:
(Tourism departments love subjective and unverifiable superlative claims!)

Regardless of which actually holds the honor (if either), one thing is undeniable: both are beautiful lighthouses!
-GeoMike-
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
GeoMike said:
Could be! It seems like every popular lighthouse is touted as the "most photographed lighthouse" :biggrin:
(Tourism departments love subjective and unverifiable superlative claims!)

Regardless of which actually holds the honor (if either), one thing is undeniable: both are beautiful lighthouses!
-GeoMike-
How do you suppose one would actually measure something like "most photographed"?

Hecta Head is visible from Highway 101 without haveing to even stop, so there are a lot of people driving by every day of the year. But who can even guess at how many take a pic?
 
  • #33
Two days left for you to submit a picture for this contest. Let's see something that will knock our socks off!

:)

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K