That's what I get as well, under Firefox on a Windows 7 workstation. Same as I've always seen since the new system was installed except that the last one, "skeptical", is newfresh_42 said:
The software always searches posts. A post is from a single user.StatGuy2000 said:
Messed up BB code somewhere I guess, but hard to diagnose based on that description.BillTre said:
I don't use the BB code, but I suppose I could have hit a button or some keys without noticing.mfb said:
Just did an exhaustive search and that .png file does not reside on this computer, even though I've used a couple Likes in this session.Greg Bernhardt said:
Greg Bernhardt said:
Greg Bernhardt said:
Yes, the labels are the same as before.BillTre said:
The interesting fact is, I am not getting the red icons from Chrome on my laptop (Win 10, the latest version of chrome). The screenshot that I posted was from Chrome on Android.fresh_42 said:
I see the red icons on Android even after clearing cache and cookies.Greg Bernhardt said:
From laptop, I am seeing the yellow icons, but from Android, I am seeing the red icons, same as what @fresh_42 posted in #307.Greg Bernhardt said:
No changes in Opera. The "like" I set was said "informative" with "thumb down" shown, and the "download linked content" led to the wrong png file, too, displayed by an image program, no browser.Greg Bernhardt said:
fresh_42 said:
fresh_42 said:
Yes.Greg Bernhardt said:
When I click the link then I use the browser as image viewer, and all is as described: correct in chrome (W10), wrong in Opera. I wanted to test the file itself.Greg Bernhardt said:
The various browsers. They interpret the code line by line, or meanwhile tag by tag, in contrast to a program which needs a compiled code and executes the compilation.
Just out of curiosity, where was the issue?Greg Bernhardt said:
I upgraded PFs core software a few days ago, it overwrote the custom reaction image.Wrichik Basu said:
I'm hiding everywhere[/size].fresh_42 said:
)I get the same thing. No "about" and a link to start a conversationTom.G said:
Yes, since there is no About information entered and the conversation button is always there.phinds said:
Ah ha.fresh_42 said:
OKaay... try this logically similar situtation.fresh_42 said:
I don't understand this comparison. The About button does what it does with every user. Some have disclosed personal information, other have not. Thus it is empty. At the bottom of the About page is always the "Start Conversation" option. Well, not always. I couldn't start a conversation with myself.Tom.G said:
Odd, I don't seem to have that option. . . always thought it was there ?fresh_42 said:
It is now above the "About" button, on the same row as the "Find" button. It does not appear when you look at your own account.OCR said:
Not even in the Quantum Physics Forum ?. . . I'm devastated ! .Tom.G said:
That occurs here ONLY when the About field is empty. It does not appear if the member has filled in the About page.fresh_42 said:
I was trying to say that the optimal behaviour when selecting an operation is to receive an informative result, not a random result if there is a problem.fresh_42 said:
Yes, a real problem with Multiple Personality syndrome.OCR said:
Even in the Quantum Physics Forum ? . . . .Tom.G said:
I would hazard an "Indeterminate", at least until the cat is out of theOCR said:Even in the Quantum Physics Forum ? . . . .
It does - below the information the user put in. See OCR's profile for example.Tom.G said:
Hmm, either we are talking about different things/positions or it is computer dependent.mfb said:
And another one, the full view, the one I see, anyway. . . .mfb said:
You sure ?mfb said:
That is because the user has set no "About", i.e. none of the fields in the about section for that user is filled.Tom.G said:
What do you mean "without special permissions"? Using a few test accounts, I always had the option.mfb said:
Check the bottom of OCR's "about" tab in the profile with a test account. There won't be a "Start a conversation" link (or any contact information). For you and for @kenny1999 there is. Where does the difference come from?Greg Bernhardt said:
Is there some minimum amount of posts required before a new user is allowed to send private messages? I seem to remember a restriction on new members sending private messages after some users were getting spam from new accounts. If your test account is new, this may be the source of the problem.mfb said:
