Chemistry PH Indicator and Endpoint Observations

  • Thread starter Thread starter i_love_science
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ph
AI Thread Summary
In the titration of a weak base with a strong acid, the endpoint volume is lower than the equivalence point volume, leading to a miscalculation of the moles of strong acid and the molarity of the weak base if the endpoint is incorrectly assumed to be the equivalence point. The discussion highlights that both B and C were seen as correct by some participants, while the answer indicated only B was correct. Titrations can still be performed by reversing the process and stopping at the first color change, although this does not occur at the equivalence point. The gradual nature of the color change, particularly with phenolphthalein, means it begins close to the equivalence point when titrating a strong acid with a strong base. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate titration results.
i_love_science
Messages
80
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
see below
Relevant Equations
titration curve
A weak base is titrated with a strong acid.
Untitled.png

Untitled 2.png


I think that both B and C are correct. The endpoint volume will be lower than the actual equivalence point volume. When the student mistakenly assumes the endpoint volume is the equivalence point volume, the number of moles of strong acid is seen as equal to the number of moles of weak base. The calculated number of moles of strong acid would be lower (because of the lower volume), and the molarity of the weak base would also be lower.

The answer says only B is correct. Could anyone explain why, and where I went wrong? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I see nothing wrong in your explanation, I would choose B and C as well.

Funny thing is, this titration is still doable, you just have to do it in the opposite direction and stop at the first color change. That's how titrations against phenolphthaleine are done :smile:
 
Borek said:
Funny thing is, this titration is still doable, you just have to do it in the opposite direction and stop at the first color change. That's how titrations against phenolphthaleine are done :smile:
Thanks, though I don't really understand the above part. If you do it in the opposite direction, the color change is still not at the equivalence point...
 
i_love_science said:
Thanks, though I don't really understand the above part. If you do it in the opposite direction, the color change is still not at the equivalence point...
Which is why you stop at the first sight of color change. Color change is not instantaneous, it takes place gradually over at least 2 pH units. In the case of phenolphthalein it means the color change (when titrating strong acid with a strong base) starts quite closely to the equivalence.

Compare http://www.titrations.info/acid-base-titration-indicators
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top