The discussion revolves around the concept of a "phased particle energy beam," exploring its definition, underlying physics, and potential research avenues. Participants express varying levels of understanding and skepticism regarding the terminology and feasibility of the concept.
Participants generally disagree on the validity and clarity of the term "phased particle energy beam," with some defending its meaning while others challenge its coherence and relevance.
The discussion lacks clear definitions and established scientific backing for the term "phased particle energy beam," leading to confusion and contention among participants.
What is a "phased particle energy beam"? It sounds to me like a group of sciencey sounding words that were thrown together but don't actually mean anything as a group. If you just say "particle beam", then a cathode ray tube qualifies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathode_ray_tubeacron said:How would someone go about to make a phased particle energy beam?
What are the physics behind it? Any research that anyone knows on the subject that I could take a look at?
Thanks
No. You are mistaking frankness for condescention. I'll be more blunt: you need to put more effort into making a better quality opening post; explaining what you are looking for/asking about.acron said:wow, condescending much?
acron said:wow, condescending much?
Phased particle energy beam means exactly that. A beam of phased energy with an embedded particle source. Compressed field laser with meson entropic properties.
The problem is that even "phased energy" does not mean much.acron said:wow, condescending much?
Phased particle energy beam means exactly that. A beam of phased energy with an embedded particle source. Compressed field laser with meson entropic properties.