Phd in Theoreticle Physics and Astrophysics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and implications of pursuing a PhD in both theoretical physics and theoretical astrophysics. Participants explore the overlap between the two fields, the relevance of specific PhD titles for employment opportunities at NASA, and the coursework involved in each program.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether it is possible to obtain a PhD in both fields simultaneously and if it would enhance job prospects at NASA.
  • Another participant argues that separate PhDs are unnecessary due to the significant overlap in coursework, suggesting that a PhD in physics with a dissertation in astrophysics is sufficient.
  • A participant inquires if a theoretical physicist could be hired in NASA's astrophysics division, wondering if an astrophysicist would be preferred instead.
  • Some participants assert that obtaining a dual PhD may not be significantly more challenging than a single one, given the similarities in the fields.
  • Another participant states that acceptance into an astrophysics PhD program is unlikely if one already holds a PhD in physics, emphasizing that the same classes would be taken.
  • One participant shares their experience of pursuing a physics PhD with an astrophysics dissertation, noting that they can focus on physics topics that interest them more.
  • A later reply mentions that while a dual PhD is possible at some universities, it may require taking less desirable courses, leading to a preference for a single PhD path.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and practicality of obtaining separate PhDs in theoretical physics and astrophysics. There is no consensus on whether a dual PhD is beneficial or necessary for career advancement.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the potential limitations of dual PhD programs, including the need to take additional coursework that may not align with their interests. The discussion reflects varying institutional policies regarding dual degrees.

Stratosphere
Messages
373
Reaction score
0
Is it possible o get a PhD in both theoretical physics and theoretical astrophysics at the same time, or is it too much to handle? Also, would it better my chances of being hired for NASA as an astrophysics and a math PHD rather than a theoretical physics and astrophysics PHD, or does it not really matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There wouldn't be a point in getting separate PhDs in both - they overlap far too much. The coursework is almost the same - exactly the same at some universities - and you can get a PhD in physics and do astrophysics for the dissertation. That's what I'm doing. Your chances of getting a job at NASA will depend a bit more on the work you've done in the field than the actual title of your PhD.
 
So you're saying that I could be hired in the astrophysics division of NASA as a theoretical physicist? Wouldn't they prefer an astrophysicist?
 
Also if the two are so closely related then getting a PHD in both wouldn't be that much harder than getting it in just one.
 
You're not going to be accepted to a PhD program in astrophysics if you already have a PhD in physics. There wouldn't be any point. You'd be taking almost the same exact classes - you can just study the material on your own. NASA would hire a physicist or astrophysicist for the same job if they met the requirements - say, research in a particular field. A PhD in physics doesn't mean you don't know astrophysics as well. I'm getting a PhD in physics and my dissertation is in astrophysics. My PhD will say physics, but I do astrophysics.
 
eri said:
I'm getting a PhD in physics and my dissertation is in astrophysics. My PhD will say physics, but I do astrophysics.

Me too. My field is particle astrophysics, and my advisor has me doing a physics PhD so that I can avoid taking astronomy courses that I don't need. That, and particle astro is basically just high energy physics in space and with cheaper equipment (it helps when nature supplies that particle acceleration mechanism).

Stratosphere, if you're really insistent on this, a professor in my department did once tell me that it's possible to do a dual PhD. The reason I didn't do this though is that I'd have to take courses like stellar astrophysics, galactic, observational, and a whole bunch of other stuff. And I probably wouldn't get to take courses like nuclear physics, quantum field theory, general relativity, and other fun stuff that I'd rather be taking. Basically it required doing the bare minimum coursework in both physics and astronomy, so it didn't seem that appealing to me. But hey, apparently it is possible at some universities (or at least at mine).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K