Photoelectric Effect: Why Can't Low Freq Light Excite Electrons?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the photoelectric effect, specifically addressing why low-frequency light cannot excite electrons from a metal surface if its frequency is below the threshold frequency of the metal. It is established that the kinetic energy of emitted electrons is a function of light frequency, not intensity. The concept of multiphoton photoemission is introduced as a method to excite electrons using high photon density light sources, while the Schottky effect is mentioned as an alternative to lower the effective work function using an external electric field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the photoelectric effect and threshold frequency
  • Knowledge of photon density and its role in multiphoton photoemission
  • Familiarity with the concept of work function in metals
  • Basic principles of electric fields and their effects on electron emission
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "multiphoton photoemission" techniques and their applications
  • Study the Schottky effect and its implications in electron emission
  • Explore the relationship between photon density and electron excitation
  • Investigate the role of electric fields in modifying work functions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and students studying quantum mechanics or solid-state physics, particularly those interested in electron emission phenomena and the photoelectric effect.

nothing0
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
a light with frequency 'v' can't excite electrons from a metal surface if the threshold frequency of the metal is greater than the frequency of the wave( the light,electromagnetic radiation)so why don't the energies of the photons add up together and then excite the electron in the surface of the metal (mean even a very intense light with the same frequency can't do it if it has less frequency intense light means lots of photons can't this photons co-operate?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You got it right. Kinetic energy of emitted electron is function of frequency and not intensity.
For very high intensity of light, it is possible.

You can throw ball up in air only up to certain height. Call your friend to help you and you together can not throw it higher (without using any tool). Friend will be useful to throw heavier ball, but then it is a different attribute.
 
nothing0 said:
a light with frequency 'v' can't excite electrons from a metal surface if the threshold frequency of the metal is greater than the frequency of the wave( the light,electromagnetic radiation)so why don't the energies of the photons add up together and then excite the electron in the surface of the metal (mean even a very intense light with the same frequency can't do it if it has less frequency intense light means lots of photons can't this photons co-operate?)

It is possible. Look up "multiphoton photoemission". This is an important technique in studying the energetics of Rydberg-type states. Note that one must use a light source that has a very high photon density. This is because the excited state has a very short lifetime, and the second photon that comes in must interact with that excited electron before it decays back to the conduction band. The probability of this happening (what we call the "cross-section") is quite low and thus, one must use a light source with a very high photon density per unit area to increase the probability of it happening. For ordinary light sources, this probability is practically zero. That's why the ordinary photoelectric effect is commonly observed.

What this means is that the ordinary photoelectric effect is a single-photon photoemission phenomenon.

BTW, note also that there's another way to cause the emission of a photoelectron even using a light with energy lower than the work function. One can apply an external electric field to the surface, thus lowering the effective work function. This is usually known as the Schottky effect.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jordan Regan

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
967
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K