The Mystery of Lamb's Paper on the Photoelectric Effect

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around the locking of a thread discussing Lamb's paper titled "The Photoelectric Effect Without Photons," published in the 1969 volume of Polarization, Matière et Rayonnement. Participants express confusion and concern over the lack of explanation for the thread's closure, questioning whether the content was misleading or if the topic itself was problematic. The author, bcrowell, is recognized for his credentials, and the paper has been cited in other discussions, indicating its relevance and potential for critique.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the photoelectric effect and its historical context.
  • Familiarity with academic publishing and citation practices.
  • Knowledge of the contributions of A. Kastler to physics.
  • Awareness of forum moderation practices and community guidelines.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Lamb's paper on modern physics discussions.
  • Explore the historical significance of the photoelectric effect in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the role of academic critiques in scientific discourse.
  • Learn about the moderation policies of online academic forums.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, academic researchers, and students interested in the photoelectric effect, as well as forum moderators and participants engaged in scientific discussions.

conway
Messages
397
Reaction score
0
I wonder why the thread on Lamb's paper was locked? I was hoping to take part in the discussion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
conway said:
I wonder why the thread on Lamb's paper was locked? I was hoping to take part in the discussion.

I was also a bit surprised to see it locked, with no comment as to why. The locked thread is [thread=372653]Lamb and "The Photoelectric Effect Without Photons"[/thread].

In fact, I had just sent a PM to bcrowell on this thread --- before it had been locked --- to say thanks, because I felt it was very useful. Now I'm worried. Was I wrong? Was bcrowell's thread misleading? Or was topic the problem.

The paper has appeared in Polarization, Matière et Rayonnement, Volume in Honour of A. Kastler (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1969) and the author has superb credentials. It has been cited in a couple of discussions, and so I would have though it was well worth having a critique of it.

Cheers -- sylas
 
If there is no explanation forthcoming as to why the other thread was shut down I am inclined to continue the discussion here...
 
It takes time for a reasonable number of mentors to see the report that was filed about that thread, and discuss it. In the meantime, please don't try to bypass the lock by starting new threads.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K