Photoluminescence at lower temperature of carbazole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the photoluminescence (PL) behavior of a thin film of hole transport material (HTM) based on carbazole at lower temperatures. It highlights the observation of the disappearance of specific PL peaks at 300K and 200K, prompting questions about the nature of interactions in organic compounds at these temperatures. Participants are encouraged to explore the underlying mechanisms affecting PL in this context. The inquiry suggests a need for a deeper understanding of temperature-dependent photophysical properties. Overall, the thread seeks insights into the interactions influencing PL in carbazole films at varying temperatures.
EL AALLAOUI Najla
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
photoluminescence at lower temperature of carbazole
Relevant Equations
photoluminescence at lower temperature of carbazole
Hello everyone,
I deposit a thin film of HTM based carbazole and I measure the PL at lower tempertaure . by fiiting the experimental results with 5 peaks . I notice the dissapering of peak 1 at 300K and peak 3 at 200K. What is the nature of the interaction that can occur at lower temperature of organic compounds and how I can explain that .

Thank you in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this homework? PF requires an attempt at an answer before we can help you with homework questions.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

The Big Picture of Solar Research
Replies
14
Views
2K
Birefringence and Automotive Window Tinting
Replies
9
Views
8K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top