Koilon
- 8
- 0
Does anyone know how energetic the most energetic photons ever detected from a natural source were and what their source was?
The discussion centers on the most energetic photons ever detected from natural sources, exploring the sources, detection methods, and interpretations of various studies, particularly those related to the Pierre Auger Observatory. The scope includes theoretical considerations, experimental findings, and the challenges of particle identification at high energies.
Participants express differing interpretations of the data and findings related to photon energies, with no consensus reached on the most energetic photons detected or the implications of the Pierre Auger Observatory's results.
The discussion highlights limitations in particle identification at high energies and the dependence on the interpretation of logarithmic scales in data presentations. There are unresolved questions regarding the nature of detected particles and the accuracy of reported energy levels.
Norman said:Check out this link to a paper that discusses the Pierre Auger Observatory searching for UHE photons. They discuss detecting photon events at about 2.2 EeV. (1 EeV = 10^18 eV).
Here is the link: http://www.auger.org/technical_info/pdfs/icrc2007/icrc602.pdf
I do not know if these are the most energetic photons detected or not.
Koilon said:I would have to question your interpretation of this very interesting article you cited. In citing the figure 2.2 EeV, I think you must be referring to Figure 3 therein, but the scale there is Log(Energy/EeV) - not Energy/EeV and the anti-Log of 2.2 would give an energy of about 158 EeV for the most energetic photons that this work detected. This is same order of magnitude as the energy of the 300 EeV Oh-My-God particle detected on October 15, 1991, over Dugway Proving Grounds, Utah - and 15 similar events detected since. So, considering that the text of the paper paper is focused on photons with energies above 10, 20 and 40 EeV, I think they obviously detected photons much more energetic than 2.2 EeV.
Norman said:And correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't the 1991 event thought to be a charged particle? I understand particle identification at these energies is very difficult, but I seem to remember that at the time (and as recently as a few years ago when I heard some talks from the Fly's Eye collab.) that they were thinking it was a positively charged particle.