I Physical proof of a simulation?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around an article claiming evidence that we live in a simulation, which is revealed to be an April Fool's joke from Scientific American. Participants express skepticism about the validity of the claims, emphasizing the publication's history of humor pieces. Some argue that even if the article is a joke, it could still contain valid points. However, others insist that discussions should be based on credible scientific literature rather than pop-science sources. The thread concludes with a reminder that only serious references are acceptable for discussion.
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the date. It is an April Fool’s joke.
 
  • Like
Likes DrChinese
Dale said:
Look at the date. It is an April Fool’s joke.
I hadn't noticed that, but I'm still not sure. They give some convincing arguments in my opinion
 
Only because you desire to be fooled on this specific topic. Scientific American has a long history of publishing April Fool’s joke pieces.
 
Dale said:
Only because you desire to be fooled on this specific topic. Scientific American has a long history of publishing April Fool’s joke pieces.
Idk, there's nothing stopping them from presenting something that's true of true adjacent as an "April fools joke".
 
  • Sad
  • Haha
Likes Motore and Dale
Sciencelad2798 said:
Idk, there's nothing stopping them from presenting something that's true of true adjacent as an "April fools joke".
Nothing stopping them, sure. But here on PF we hold a higher standard. We require that all posts be consistent with the professional scientific literature. Scientific American is a pop-sci source, not part of the professional literature.

If you wish to discuss this topic here you will need to get a real reference. Not a joke piece in the pop-sci literature.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Hamiltonian
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
8K
Replies
41
Views
5K