Physicists Successfully Store and Retrieve Nothing

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicists
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of storing and retrieving a "squeezed vacuum" state of light, as reported by two teams of physicists. It explores the implications of this achievement for quantum information and telecommunication technologies, as well as the nature of vacuum states in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe the achievement of storing a "squeezed vacuum" state, noting its relation to previous work on stopping light and its potential applications in quantum technologies.
  • One participant explains the concept of squeezed states, emphasizing the manipulation of uncertainties in position and momentum while maintaining the minimum uncertainty product.
  • Another participant challenges the characterization of the squeezed vacuum as "nothing," arguing that it contains a large, albeit uncertain, number of quanta and has a mean energy greater than the ground state energy.
  • A critical viewpoint is presented, suggesting that such stories contribute to a perception of scientific sensationalism and may misrepresent the actual experiments and their results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the squeezed vacuum and the implications of the reported achievement. There is no consensus on whether the term "nothing" is appropriate in this context, and the discussion reflects both technical explanations and critical perspectives.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of defining vacuum states in quantum mechanics and the potential for misinterpretation in popular science narratives. Unresolved questions remain regarding the implications of squeezed states and their representation in quantum theory.

SF
By Adrian Cho
ScienceNOW Daily News
29 February 2008
It sounds like a headline from the spoof newspaper The Onion, but for physicists, this is actually an achievement: Two teams have stored nothing in a puff of gas and then retrieved it a split second later. Storing a strange form of vacuum builds on previous efforts in which researchers stopped light in its tracks (ScienceNOW, 22 January 2001) and may mark a significant step toward new quantum information and telecommunication technologies.

http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/229/1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SF said:
Two teams have stored nothing in a puff of gas and then retrieved it a split second later. Storing a strange form of vacuum builds on previous efforts in which researchers stopped light in its tracks (ScienceNOW, 22 January 2001) and may mark a significant step toward new quantum information and telecommunication technologies.

For the benefit of other readers, the article is about "storing" a "squeezed vacuum"
state of light.

The notion of "squeezed" states basically refers to the possibility that, given a minimum
uncertainty state, where [itex]\Delta p \Delta q =[/itex] (minimum), one can play with
the individual uncertainties in position and momentum (e.g: increasing [itex]\Delta p[/itex]
but decreasing [itex]\Delta q[/itex], while still maintaining the minimum uncertainty
product. It's called "squeezing" because if you draw a diagram of this in phase space,
a circle gets squeezed to an ellipse (while maintaining total area).

This idea applies to state of zero photons (normally called a "vacuum"). If a
"vacuum" state has (determinately) zero energy-momentum, it must have totally
indeterminate position. If confined in space (so that its position uncertainty
decreases, its momentum uncertainty must increase). The experiment just
confirms the well-known fact that the details of what's happing at the
so-called "dark" ports in a quantum optics experiment are important
quantum mechanically. There is not just a single unique universal notion of
"vacuum state" in general.

Wikipedia has more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeezed_state

The squeezing transformations correspond to certain "canonical transformations"
in classical Hamiltonian dynamics (which can mix position and momentum
variables without changing the form of Hamilton's equations). The full group of
these canonical transformations is not always well-represented when one passes
to a quantum theory. E.g., in (infinite-dimensional) QFT based on unitary irreps
of the Poincare group, one finds that there are physically-important
transformations (field displacements, Bogoliubov transformations) that are
useful in generalized coherent states, superconductivity, and more,
but are not implemented sensibly in the usual Hilbert-Fock space.
 
Last edited:
The squeezed vacuum is actually not a vacuum. It contains a large (but uncertain) number of quanta. Its mean energy is larger than the ground state energy. Hence it is not "nothing".
 
yawn... this kind of story just makes physicists look like idiots, just like their earlier story on "stopping light". some droll sort of scientific sensationalism, which after written for the masses by some semi-scientist makes little sense and generally the story has next to nothing to do with the actual experiment or its results.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K