Physics behind climb cutting and conventional cutting

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hihiip201
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cutting Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences between climb cutting and conventional cutting in milling operations. Climb cutting is established to provide a superior surface finish compared to conventional cutting, although it requires higher torque. The physics behind this advantage lies in the mechanics of chip formation, where the chip in climb cutting acts as a mechanical leverage, distributing force more effectively across the cutter's surface. This contrasts with conventional cutting, where the tool slides across the surface, leading to increased tool wear.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of milling operations and tool geometry
  • Knowledge of torque and load in machining
  • Familiarity with chip formation mechanics
  • Basic concepts of surface finish quality in machining
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of chip formation in milling
  • Study the effects of torque on tool performance in climb cutting
  • Explore advanced milling techniques for improved surface finishes
  • Learn about tool wear mechanisms in conventional vs. climb cutting
USEFUL FOR

Machinists, manufacturing engineers, and students in mechanical engineering who are looking to enhance their understanding of milling techniques and improve machining efficiency.

hihiip201
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
Hi guys:


For basic info: wikipedia: mill cutting : conventional cutting and climb cutting, there's a graph showing how a mill cutting cuts.

Yesterday in the shop my instructor taught me that climb cutting gives better surface finish than conventional cutting, yet it requires more load(torque). But I have yet to understand the physics behind it.


Wikipedia page's explanation is not that satisfying either, there's nothing that it says about climb cutting I cannot say the same about convention cutting. On the page it says that in conventional cutting is slides across the surface of the part hence dulling the tool, but if I understand this correctly when you are cutting, the tip of your tool is always sliding across the new surface you are creating as you are cutting, so I don't see how climb cutting is better than conventional to be honest.

What am I not seeing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only reason I can possibly come up with , is that the chip in climb cutting acts as an mechanical leverage that allows the force to be distributed on more surface of the cutter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K