Please explain the reaction between Potassium carbonate and Magnesium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a YouTube video demonstrating the reaction K2CO3 + Mg = K + C + MgO, raising questions about the displacement of potassium by magnesium. The key point is that the reaction is driven by thermodynamics, particularly the formation of stable magnesium oxide (MgO), which has a high enthalpy of formation and releases significant heat. While the reactivity series is mentioned, it is noted that thermodynamic stability is more critical in predicting the reaction's outcome. Participants clarify that magnesium's tendency to form stable oxides like MgO is what facilitates the reaction, emphasizing the importance of thermodynamic principles over simple reactivity comparisons.
lioric
Messages
335
Reaction score
26
TL;DR Summary
Why does Mg reduce K2CO3 even though K is higher in the reactivity series
I saw this video on YouTube, ()
which shows a person making potassium with the following reaction

K2CO3 + Mg = K + C + MgO

I just don’t understand how Mg can displace K

I googled the reaction but couldn’t find much info on this reaction. Could someone give the name to this, or explain the chemistry behind it? There is a part where he uses KMnO4 and glycerin to start the reaction.

Thank you for your time.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Haven't watched the whole video, but by the sound of it it is in a way similar to reducing oxides like it is commonly done in thermites.

Reactivity series is just part of the picture, and even not the most important one. What really matters when predicting reaction products is thermodynamics: ΔG = ΔH - TΔS (and sometimes kinetics, but that's not the case here). In this particular case reaction is probably driven by the MgO creation, such oxides are very stable and have very high enthalpy of formation (more or less making them produces a lot of heat).
 
Borek said:
Haven't watched the whole video, but by the sound of it it is in a way similar to reducing oxides like it is commonly done in thermites.

Reactivity series is just part of the picture, and even not the most important one. What really matters when predicting reaction products is thermodynamics: ΔG = ΔH - TΔS (and sometimes kinetics, but that's not the case here). In this particular case reaction is probably driven by the MgO creation, such oxides are very stable and have very high enthalpy of formation (more or less making them produces a lot of heat).
Like always sir, you give a great explanation. Cannot count how many times you’ve helped out. Thank you so much. This was great.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, WWGD and BillTre
Borek said:
Haven't watched the whole video, but by the sound of it it is in a way similar to reducing oxides like it is commonly done in thermites.

Reactivity series is just part of the picture, and even not the most important one. What really matters when predicting reaction products is thermodynamics: ΔG = ΔH - TΔS (and sometimes kinetics, but that's not the case here). In this particular case reaction is probably driven by the MgO creation, such oxides are very stable and have very high enthalpy of formation (more or less making them produces a lot of heat).
Hello Borek👋, so what you're saying is that the whole reaction is possible is because Mg which is an Alkali earth metal has an affinity to form oxides is that it?
 
Redriq1 said:
Hello Borek👋, so what you're saying is that the whole reaction is possible is because Mg which is an Alkali earth metal has an affinity to form oxides is that it?

More like "high stability of MgO is what drives the reaction".
 
Borek said:
More like "high stability of MgO is what drives the reaction".
Oooohh so since MgO is more stable than K2CO3 it tends to from MgO in this reaction.. Am i right?
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top