MHB Polynomial Challenge: Find Real Solutions

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Find the number of distinct real solutions of the equation

$(x − 1)(x − 3)(x − 5) · · · (x − 2017) = (x − 2)(x − 4)(x − 6) · · · (x − 2016)$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Find the number of distinct real solutions of the equation

$(x − 1)(x − 3)(x − 5) · · · (x − 2017) = (x − 2)(x − 4)(x − 6) · · · (x − 2016)$.

the above is same as
$P(x) = (x - 1)(x - 3)(x - 5) \cdots (x - 2017) - (x - 2)(x - 4)(x - 6) \cdots (x - 2016)= 0$
This is a polynomial of degree 1009.
this has product of 1009 terms in the 1st term
now let us compute P(2n) for n = 1 to 1008
this is +ve for n odd( as in 1st term there are n positive and 1009-n -ve terms
and 2nd term is zero) and -ve for n even. and $P(-\infty) < 0$ and $P(\infty) > 0$ so sign changes 1009 times
so 1009 real roots.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top