Polynomials, Kernels and Derivatives

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on differentiating the expression Y(x) = (1/n!) ∫₀ˣ (x-t)ⁿ f(t) dt to derive Y'(x) = (1/(n-1)!) ∫₀ˣ (x-t)ⁿ⁻¹ f(t) dt. The proof leverages binomial expansion and induction, demonstrating that the second term in the differentiation process cancels out due to the properties of binomial coefficients. The application of Leibniz's rule for differentiation under the integral sign is also highlighted as a straightforward method to achieve the result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically differentiation and integration techniques.
  • Familiarity with binomial expansion and its applications in calculus.
  • Knowledge of Leibniz's rule for differentiating under the integral sign.
  • Basic concepts of polynomial functions and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Leibniz's rule in various contexts of calculus.
  • Explore binomial expansion in greater detail, particularly in relation to polynomial differentiation.
  • Research induction proofs in calculus to solidify understanding of generalization techniques.
  • Examine advanced topics in integral calculus, focusing on differentiation of parameter-dependent integrals.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of polynomial differentiation and integral calculus techniques.

psholtz
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Is there a simple way to show that when we differentiate the following expression (call this equation 1):

[tex]Y(x) = \frac{1}{n!} \int_0^x (x-t)^n f(t)dt[/tex]

that we will get the following expression (call this equation 2):

[tex]Y'(x) = \frac{1}{(n-1)!}\int_0^x (x-t)^{n-1}f(t)dt[/tex]

It's simple enough to prove "by hand", for low-order polynomials. For instance, for n=1 we would have:

[tex]Y(x) = \int_0^x (x-t)f(t)dt = x\int_0^x f(t)dt - \int_0^x tf(t)dt[/tex]

[tex]Y'(x) = \int_0^x f(t)dt + xf(x) - xf(x) = \int_0^x f(t)dt[/tex]

and it can be proved just as easily for n=2, 3, etc.. But is there a straightforward way to prove it for general n? By induction perhaps? I'm reading a text where the author just goes from Equation 1 to Equation 2, and keeps rolling, w/o giving much in the way of explanation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, I think I answered my own question.

Do a binomial expansion on the polynomial term. The kth term in this expansion is given by:

[tex](x-t)^n = \left(\array{c}n \\ k\endarray\right)x^{n-k}(-t)^k[/tex]

so the function Y can be rewritten as the sum:

[tex]Y(x) = \frac{1}{n!}\int_0^x \left[\sum_{k=0}^n \left(\array{c}n \\ k\endarray\right)x^{n-k}(-t)^k\right] \cdot f(t)dt[/tex]

Take the kth term in this sum:

[tex]Y_k(x) = \frac{(-1)^k}{n!}\left(\array{c}n \\ k \endarray\right)x^{n-k}\int_0^x t^kf(t)dt[/tex]

Differentiating w.r.t. x:

[tex]Y_k'(x) = \frac{(-1)^k}{n!}\left(\array{c}n \\k \endarray\right)(n-k)x^{(n-1)-k}\int_0^x t^kf(t)dt + \frac{(-1)^k}{n!}\left(\array{c}n \\ k\endarray\right)x^nf(x)[/tex]

Consider the second term. It can be written as:

[tex]\frac{x^nf(x)}{n!}\left(\array{c}n \\ k\endarray\right)\left(-1\right)^k[/tex]

and consider the sum of these terms, from 0 to n:

[tex]S_{n} = \frac{x^nf(x)}{n!}\sum_{k=0}^n \left(\array{c}n\\k\endarray\right)(-1)^k[/tex]

Since we can write:

[tex]\sum_{k=0}^n \left(\array{c}n\\k \endarray\right)(-1)^k<br /> = \sum_{k=0}^n \left(\array{c}n \\ k \endarray\right)(1)^{n-k}(-1)^k = (1-1)^n = 0 [/tex]

Then clearly the "second term" in Y_k'(x) drops out when we sum the components up.

Consider now the first term in Y_k'(x):

[tex]\frac{n-k}{n!}\left(\array{c}n\\k\endarray\right)\int_0^x x^{(n-1)-k} (-t)^kf(t)dt[/tex]

and specifically, the coefficient on this term:

[tex]\frac{n-k}{n!}\left(\array{c}n\\k\endarray\right) = \frac{n-k}{n!} \cdot \frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{1}{n\cdot (n-1)!} \cdot \frac{n \cdot (n-1)!}{k!((n-1)-k)!}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{1}{(n-1)!} \cdot \frac{(n-1)!}{k! ((n-1)-k)!}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{1}{(n-1)!} \cdot \left(\array{c}n-1\\k\endarray\right)[/tex]

So that, ignoring the "second" term on Y_k'(x), which we already showed sums to 0, we can write Y_k'(x) as:

[tex]Y_k'(x) = \frac{1}{(n-1)!}\int_0^x \left(\array{c}n-1 \\ k\endarray\right)x^{(n-1)-k}(-t)^kf(t)dt[/tex]

so now summing over 0 to n-1, to get the full expression for Y'(x), we get:

[tex]Y'(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} Y_k'(x) = \frac{1}{(n-1)!}\int_0^x (x-t)^{n-1}f(t)dt[/tex]

which was to be proved..
 
To differentiate

[tex] Y(x) = \frac{1}{n!} \int_0^x (x-t)^n f(t)dt[/tex]

with respect to x, just use the appropriate version of Leibnitz's rule:

[tex]\frac d {dx}\int_0^x f(x,t)\, dt = f(x,x) + \int_0^x f_x(x,t)\, dt[/tex]

This gives your result immediately.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K