Population III Stars Metallicity

  • Thread starter Drakkith
  • Start date
  • #1
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
21,078
4,902
Early Population III stars in the universe were very metal poor if not metal free and were apparently required to be much larger than todays stars, up to hundreds of solar masses, to form. What does the metallicity have to do with this?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
35,134
11,372
Metals can catalyze fusion, metals can emit light and reduce the pressure in gas clouds.
Put everything in a simulation, and you might get some estimate for stellar masses somehow - no idea how this works in detail.
 
  • #3
Matterwave
Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,965
326
Are you sure this is a causation rather than a correlation? Perhaps older stars were larger for some other reason? I can't see how metallicity would have THIS much of a drastic effect on stellar masses, I would suspect there has to be some other cause along with the metallicity.
 
  • #4
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
21,078
4,902
I have no idea Matterwave. I've merely read that the reason super massive stars were the only ones that could form was because of metallicity. Or at least that was what I got from it.
 
  • #5
nicksauce
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,272
5
I think you can summarize the idea simply: No metals = Less cooling = Higher temperatures = Higher Jeans mass = Higher stellar mass

This seems to be a good overview of the situation (pdf): http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0102503v3.pdf
 
  • #6
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
21,078
4,902
Nice paper, thanks Nick!
 

Related Threads on Population III Stars Metallicity

Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
622
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
902
Top