Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Complaint Possible additional rules for mods

  1. Nov 9, 2016 #1
    I've recently noticed mods on PF are allowed privileges not available on most forums.
    They can edit not only their own posts but also other peoples' posts in order to conceal any error in their original post and even, it seems, boast about it with impunity.
    That post is gone but the memory lingers on.....

    Mods can remove posts with no apparent indication they've ever existed.
    I doubt it works every time, but one way to prevent any visible challenge to a plausible post which breaks forum rules is to deliberately break forum rules in a later post and challenge the mods to do something about it.
    In this instance the post was left but all criticism was deleted.
    There was a suggestion by (I think) a mod that my own post broke forum rules. As I didn't receive any sanction I have to assume it didn't.
    Predictably, no one posted any further criticism and it's now (I think) against forum rules to refer to it directly.

    The most irritating thing is that the claim in that post is largely accurate, but the only evidence given is an almost certainly false statement by a lazy reporter.
    That statement has been debunked on other forums, making PF members look credulous.

    In future I'll be reluctant to put much effort into a post in case it gets silently deleted; a form of self censorship.
    All I have left of those posts is a few innocuous emails - no smoking gun.
    I now have a small amount of sympathy for FBI Director James Comey....

    I suggest that mods be required to indicate clearly any editing of users' posts.
    If posts in a thread are deleted, mods should at least leave a post indicating how many posts have been deleted and normally why they've been deleted.
    Most forums allow fine control of permissions; if possible mods should not be allowed to 'vaporize' posts.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 9, 2016 #2

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Moderators can edit and or/delete posts of other users in every forum I know. This is necessary to remove violations against the forum rules. Posts of other users get edited or deleted only for moderation purposes. This is often clearly marked ("xyz removed by mentor", or a comment in a mentor's post later), if it does not influence the thread this note can get omitted - the user writing the post gets a message from us anyway.
    If you talk about a specific example, it would help to link to this example.
     
  4. Nov 9, 2016 #3

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    You had one post in the POTUS thread that was reported and was among a number of posts that were deleted. Do you want a copy of it?

    Where did this come from? Did you make this up? What post was this?
     
  5. Nov 9, 2016 #4

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    As mentioned above, moderators on most forums do have the same privileges. It is standard software with standard features. We do moderate more actively than most other forums, but the tools are the same.

    That would also be a way to get banned.
     
  6. Nov 10, 2016 #5

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    you seem to have some serious mis-understandings on what is the standard practices of what can be done by moderators on forums

    I moderate on a couple of other forums ... I have all the same powers as the mentors do on PF
    As do all my fellow moderators on those other forums

    I agree completely with the comments by @mfb and @Dale. the differences you suggest don't exist

    Be a good solid member of the forum, post good information with references where possible. Don't post garbage.
    Don't go out of your way to upset people PARTICULARLY the mentors. and you will have a good experience here :smile:


    regards
    Dave
     
  7. Nov 10, 2016 #6

    Krylov

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    I can partly understand the OPs criticism, but I also think it is flawed by certain inaccuracies such as missing references to specific quotes and examples. (Probably it would be better anyway to discuss these in private messages with the mods in question or with @Greg Bernhardt, not in a public topic that is susceptible to flaming.) This is a pity, because I do feel there does exist a problem that fortunately largely concentrates in the non-technical sections of the forum.
    What "upsets" someone is rather subjective. Sometimes people are surprised by what upsets me and vice versa. I can imagine that even between different mods there exist differences in this regard. Forum rules should be as objective as possible, and they should be applied objectively.

    N.B. This will be my first and last contribution to this topic. It is likely going to be locked anyway.
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2016
  8. Nov 10, 2016 #7
    I'm sorry about the delay; I had limited available time.
    It certainly influenced the thread, making a post effectively unchallengeable - see my first post. I received no message.
    Posts were deleted shortly after https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/potus-election-2016-a-fresh-start.890278/page-11#post-5614257
    No thank you.
    It's a response to
    I now believe the 'televised press statement' is fictitious and also my post may have inadvertently breached forum rules.
    A rather disingenuous fishing expedition.

    'Where did this come from?'
    A deleted post probably sometime between 11:41GMT on 7/11/16 and 14:08GMT on 8/11/16.
    'Did you make this up?'
    oops, I misquoted...
    The words 'I do it because I can.' are not entirely accurate but the sentiment is. I think 'because I can' is accurate.
    'What post was this?'
    This is not a post which was sent to me as an email.

    If you (or any Mentor) post again in this thread I would appreciate you first checking if that sentiment is expressed in any deleted post within the relevant time period and otherwise, if possible, check the log for evidence of any permanently deleted post, then post your findings.
    I'm tolerant of trivial and even significant apparent errors in moderation if I believe the moderator is acting in good faith; in this instance I had no tolerance of the moderator who wrote 'I do it because I can.' and might be moderating the thread.

    Perhaps I wasn't clear.
    I was referring mostly to what moderators are allowed to do by forum rules, not limitations imposed by the software. Also, I'm only familiar with phpbb, where fine tuning of permissions for individuals and groups of moderators etc is simple; perhaps not with xenForo.
    However, in xenForo it does seem simple to disable 'vaporize' for mods. I'm sure most mods have hard deleted a post on occasion and come to regret it.
    There are forums where silently deleting posts would be greeted with outrage.
    That post was deleted by a mod so presumably the poster lives to fight another day.
    See my response to Dale.
    Thanks.
    I was deliberately vague (too vague?) about references as only mods [perhaps I should say Mentors] can make specific responses and could readily trace the posts.
    Only mods know whether the posts are still extant and only Evo has provided any information i.e. that my post is soft deleted.
    I'm mostly working by memory.

    My main aim here was to suggest a few simple rule changes so that members don't find their in thread posts deleted for no given reason and others reading a thread will be aware when strange lacunae are caused by deleted posts.

    so once again...

    I suggest that mods be required to indicate clearly any editing of users' posts.
    If posts in a thread are deleted, mods should at least leave a post indicating how many posts have been deleted and normally why they've been deleted.
    Most forums allow fine control of permissions; if possible mods should not be allowed to 'vaporize' posts.


    I emphasise again that I am not suggesting software to prevent mods soft deleting posts with no trace provided to members; rather that without software coercion they should leave a member readable record of their actions.

    I don't know if mods leave an automatic member readable record when they edit posts; if not they should provide one. [something basic like 'link disabled' would be fine.]
     
  9. Nov 10, 2016 #8
    A brief addition:

    I'm only really interested in the question of rules for Mentors and that Evo withdraw the implicit accusation that I'm lying.
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2016
  10. Nov 10, 2016 #9

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    You alleged moderator impropriety in a way that by your own admission was purposely vague and a misquote. @Evo's request for a reference will not be withdrawn both because we want to know what the real context is and what the truth of the incident is - regardless of where the fault lies (in you or in one of us).

    Please provide additional information so we can track down this issue/post. What you said is still not clear. Are you saying this was said in a PM to you? Or a thread? What thread? By whom?

    Also, just FYI, but a software limitation makes it difficult to track deleted posts by poster. In the previous version, you could look at a person's posting history and the deleted posts were included (for moderators to view). Now they are not.
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2016
  11. Nov 10, 2016 #10

    Drakkith

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I can only speak for myself, but I have not. Standard procedure is to never hard-delete a post. It would be very difficult to even accidentally hard-delete a post thanks to how the forum software is set up.

    Your suggestions are, for the most part, already in-place. Members who are infracted and have their posts deleted receive private messages explaining the infraction. If posts by more than one user are deleted, we (usually) send people a notification stating that their post was deleted and a short message as to why. This doesn't show up as a private message, but as a notification under the 'alerts' dropdown. If the number of posts deleted is particularly large, the mentor will usually leave a message in-thread saying that several posts were deleted.

    If a mentor edits a post to the extent that it changes the content and/or meaning, then a note is left in the post saying so. Something like: [Mentor's Note: Post edited to remove X content] or [Link to questionable site deleted by mentor].

    However, we mentors are merely human beings and do make mistakes. If you were not sent a notification then it was probably just a accident.
     
  12. Nov 10, 2016 #11

    Ryan_m_b

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    I only have two points to add to everything that has been said so far:

    1) Members are always free to PM mentors and ask for clarification, as it says in the rules and guidelines. As Drakkith said a lack of communication can just be an honest mistake.

    2) This forum is very busy and we get 20-40 reports to deal with a day. Most are quick fixes, but some are complex issues that require groups of us to discuss the issue back and forth. Please remember that the team of moderators are all volunteers and most of us have full time jobs, families and other obligations.

    I'm not saying this to excuse everything, but quite often there are perfectly reasonably explanations beyond malice.
     
  13. Nov 10, 2016 #12

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Carrock, I have just sent the original report of your post to the mentor's forum. I did not give you a warning, you stated opinion as fact, I should have, but I gave you a break, I also deleted the other posts in the thread referring to and criticizing your post. I read all of the posts, there is nothing similar to any comment from anyone "I do it because I can." I never responded to your comment or the comments of those that commented on your post. So I have no Idea where you are coming up with that.

    When I do multiple deletions to clean up a thread, unless you get a warning, I do not send pm's, it's just comments in the lounge, it's not the science forums, which might warrant notification.
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2016
  14. Nov 10, 2016 #13
    Thanks Drakkith, Ryan_m_b and Evo.

    Pity I didn't know those things earlier....

    Evo : I didn't realise until a few minutes ago that I hadn't specified that the alleged post was almost certainly in the POTUS Election 2016- a Fresh Start thread.

    Other than the remote possibility of something in another thread, I can only think I somehow misread a post; when I came back hours later and found it gone that confirmed what I thought I'd read. Sorry I don't have an explanation even I find convincing.

    Thankyou for taking the time to read all the posts.
     
  15. Nov 10, 2016 #14

    vela

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Education Advisor


    For what it's worth, I seem to recall seeing a post like that recently, though I don't remember where. I only mention it to suggest Carrock isn't making it up, though he might be misinterpreting the nature or intent of the post.
     
  16. Nov 10, 2016 #15

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I'm sure, but it doesn't appear to have anything to do with this string of posts, that's why I wanted to know where he saw it.
     
  17. Nov 10, 2016 #16

    kith

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

  18. Nov 10, 2016 #17

    Bystander

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    Me too.
    Nope, that's not the one.
     
  19. Nov 10, 2016 #18

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That was my first thought. Thanks for linking it. Seems in my opinion pretty far off on context/intent. And FYI, besides the fact I pointed out that I made an edit, people may not be aware that the forum software saves the edit history (the actual content) so I couldn't have hidden it from her if I wanted to.
     
  20. Nov 10, 2016 #19

    Evo

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Seriously, if a mentor made a comment like that, it was made in jest, (you haven't seen Greg's torture chamber for unruly mentors), and that was also a joke. I personally make a point of keeping a copy of EVERYTHING. When I edit a member's post, I send a copy of the original to the permanent report record first. Then if a member claims they didn't say something, I can simply pull up the original post.

    And sometimes, they were right, I read it wrong and I have to apologize and remove the warning. Sometimes I was right and the warning stays. It works both ways.
     
  21. Nov 10, 2016 #20

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Possible additional rules for mods
  1. Skin mod (Replies: 5)

  2. Use Latex mod (Replies: 1)

  3. Mods deleting threads (Replies: 3)

Loading...