Possible misenterpretations of the known universe

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrModesty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the nature of stars and the possibility that some observed stars might be reflections rather than actual celestial bodies. Participants examine the implications of gravitational influence on stars and the challenges of observing such effects at great distances.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that some stars could be reflections seen through ice, particularly at greater distances, although they acknowledge this as a speculative idea.
  • Another participant asserts that gravitational influence indicates the reality of stars, implying that this influence is a key factor in their existence.
  • A follow-up question challenges the feasibility of accounting for gravitational influence on distant stars, suggesting that it may be more complex to gauge at greater distances.
  • A clarification is made that while all stars are subject to gravitational influence, not all effects are directly observable, and reflections would likely be too faint to appear as stars.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of stars, with some supporting the idea of gravitational influence as evidence of their reality, while others question the implications of distance on such observations. The discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully defined the parameters of gravitational influence or the conditions under which reflections might be observed, leaving some assumptions unaddressed.

MrModesty
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
After observing an icicle the other day, I came to the conclusion that perhaps some of the "stars" that we see in space could just be reflections. Is it possible that we are seeing light passed through a mostly ice object and accounting it for a dimmer star? This seems most plausible at greater distances. Of course, this is just my imagination running rampant. Thanks for any help.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The short answer is gravitational influence. While not all stars are subject to gravitational influence, there are enough to suggest they are real.
 
Chronos said:
The short answer is gravitational influence. While not all stars are subject to gravitational influence, there are enough to suggest they are real.

Can we really account for most stars gravitational influence? By gravitational influence, I'm assuming that you mean on other stars in their galaxies. Wouldn't this be harder to gauge the farther away you get?
 
I should clarify that all stars are subject to gravitational influence, but not all such effects are directly observable. Reflections in space would be far too faint to mimic a star.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K