Possible Third Mattauch Violation: Beta Decay in Cm-247?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter snorkack
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for a third Mattauch violation involving the isotopes Cm-247 and Bk-247, specifically examining their decay modes, including beta decay and electron capture. Participants explore the implications of these decay processes and their relevance to established Mattauch violations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that Cm-247 and Bk-247 are radioactive but primarily decay via alpha decay and fission, questioning if their lack of beta decay constitutes a third Mattauch violation.
  • Others challenge the assertion that no beta decay or electron capture is possible, suggesting that non-observation does not imply non-existence, particularly for exotic nuclides.
  • It is mentioned that Bk-247 decays by beta emission to Cm-247, although this process is expected to occur over millions of years.
  • There is a discussion about the masses of Cm-247 and Bk-247, with participants confirming that the mass values include electrons and noting that Cm-247 is heavier.
  • Some participants speculate on the possibility of Cm-247 undergoing beta decay, acknowledging that while it is not impossible, the likelihood is extremely low due to a tiny energy difference and a large spin difference.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the decay modes of Cm-247 and Bk-247, with no consensus reached regarding the implications for Mattauch violations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the potential for beta decay in Cm-247.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations related to the assumptions about decay processes and the implications of mass differences, as well as the uncertainty surrounding the existence of beta decay or electron capture in these isotopes.

snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
Notorious Mattauch violations are:
Sb-123 and Te-123 (both stable)
Hf-180 and Ta-180 (both stable)
But should Cm-247 and Bk-247 also count?
Both are radioactive - but only to alpha decay and, in case of Bk-247, fission.
Does the absence of electron capture or beta decay count as third Mattauch violation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure there are no beta decays or electron capture possible? The non-observation doesn’t mean they don’t exist, especially for exotic nuclides.
 
Bk-247 decays by beta emission to Cm-247. However it will be very slow: possibly millions of years.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb
Vanadium 50 said:
Bk-247 decays by beta emission to Cm-247. However it will be very slow: possibly millions of years.
By both emission and capture, or by capture alone?
 
You can look up the masses and calculate it yourself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
That was very polite.
 
I seem to get
Cm-247: 247.070354
Bk-247: 247.070307

Is that the mass of atom, with electrons?
 
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Which means that it is Cm-247 which is heavier.
 
  • #11
mfb said:
Right.
Then might Cm-247 undergo beta decay?
Cm-247 is also notable for absence of spontaneous fission.
 
  • #12
snorkack said:
Then might Cm-247 undergo beta decay?
It is not impossible. With the tiny energy difference and the large spin difference it is extremely unlikely, however.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K