Power, Rpm, Torque - Horsepower increase for my small engine

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenge of extracting comparable power from a larger lawn mower-type gas engine to that of a high-performance chainsaw, specifically the Stihl MS 880 or 881. Participants explore the parameters affecting engine power, including design constraints and potential modifications, while considering off-the-shelf components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines that engine power is related to Brake Mean Effective Pressure (BMEP), mean piston speed, total bore area, and volumetric efficiency, suggesting that doubling any of these parameters could double the power.
  • It is noted that doubling BMEP is unlikely, but changing fuel or adding oxygen (e.g., nitrous injection) could help increase power.
  • Mean piston speed is also considered difficult to double due to reliability concerns, although some room for adjustment may exist if reliability is compromised.
  • Volumetric efficiency is highlighted as a promising area for improvement, potentially through forced induction or tuning of intake and exhaust systems.
  • Another participant questions whether a 16hp John Deere engine could exceed the power output of the Stihl chainsaw without major modifications, expressing concerns about cost and noise associated with the chainsaw.
  • There is a reiteration of the original inquiry about the feasibility of achieving desired power levels with the John Deere engine compared to the chainsaw.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the feasibility of achieving the desired power output from the lawn mower engine compared to the chainsaw. There is no consensus on whether the John Deere engine can outperform the Stihl chainsaw without significant modifications.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations related to the assumptions about engine modifications, reliability, and the specific parameters that can be altered without extensive redesign.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in engine performance, modifications, and comparisons between different powerplants in small engine applications may find this discussion relevant.

ThinkR
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Hello all, the short story is, I am basically trying to get the same ( or a little more) “power” out of a larger lawn mower type gas engine ( vertical shaft) as one of the largest (120 ish cc) chainsaws ( ref the Stihl MS 880 or newer 881 at approx 10-12k rpm and 9 Hp)
The parameters are : a relatively small form and weight as close to that of the chainsaw as feasible. (but I realize at least double is likely). With off the shelf parts for the most part. I have already built an aluminum “power plate” to hold such a motor and trans which simply has 2 bearings and 5/8” shafts to transfer the power with a centrifugal clutch on the motor side with an approx 2 inch sprocket and an approx 8” sprocket on the driven side. It does not have enough “ power” to drive my machine. TIA to all who participate.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The engine power is directly related to:
  • Brake Mean Effective Pressure (BMEP)
  • Mean piston speed (= RPM X Stroke)
  • Total Bore area (= piston bore area X number of pistons)
  • Volumetric efficiency
Double any of those (without altering the others) and you will double your power. Or increase each of them by 19% and you will also double the power.

Stroke and bore seem to be what you don't want to change so this leaves:
  • BMEP: Doubling it is very unlikely. Your best bet is changing the fuel and/or adding oxygen (i.e. injecting nitrous).
  • Mean piston speed (through the RPM): Doubling it is very unlikely because it is usually optimized for power vs reliability. But if you can accept losing reliability, you might get some room here.
  • Volumetric efficiency: Probably your best bet overall. It is usually done with force induction (turbo or supercharger). But if your engine intake and exhaust systems are not already tuned, redesigning them would make a big difference without any reliability consequences.
Increasing each of these three things by 26% will also double your power.

Except for intake & exhaust systems tuning, any modification will most likely require stronger components (piston, connecting rod, crankshaft, etc.) for great power increases, or at least machining with tight tolerances (blueprinting).
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ThinkR and berkeman
Wow. Great response. Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jack action
ThinkR said:
Hello all, the short story is, I am basically trying to get the same ( or a little more) “power” out of a larger lawn mower type gas engine ( vertical shaft) as one of the largest (120 ish cc) chainsaws ( ref the Stihl MS 880 or newer 881 at approx 10-12k rpm and 9 Hp)
The parameters are : a relatively small form and weight as close to that of the chainsaw as feasible. (but I realize at least double is likely). With off the shelf parts for the most part. I have already built an aluminum “power plate” to hold such a motor and trans which simply has 2 bearings and 5/8” shafts to transfer the power with a centrifugal clutch on the motor side with an approx 2 inch sprocket and an approx 8” sprocket on the driven side. It does not have enough “ power” to drive my machine. TIA to all who participate.
jack action said:
The engine power is directly related to:
  • Brake Mean Effective Pressure (BMEP)
  • Mean piston speed (= RPM X Stroke)
  • Total Bore area (= piston bore area X number of pistons)
  • Volumetric efficiency
Double any of those (without altering the others) and you will double your power. Or increase each of them by 19% and you will also double the power.

Stroke and bore seem to be what you don't want to change so this leaves:
  • BMEP: Doubling it is very unlikely. Your best bet is changing the fuel and/or adding oxygen (i.e. injecting nitrous).
  • Mean piston speed (through the RPM): Doubling it is very unlikely because it is usually optimized for power vs reliability. But if you can accept losing reliability, you might get some room here.
  • Volumetric efficiency: Probably your best bet overall. It is usually done with force induction (turbo or supercharger). But if your engine intake and exhaust systems are not already tuned, redesigning them would make a big difference without any reliability consequences.
Increasing each of these three things by 26% will also double your power.

Except for intake & exhaust systems tuning, any modification will most likely require stronger components (piston, connecting rod, crankshaft, etc.) for great power increases, or at least machining with tight tolerances (blueprinting).
I guess what I am asking is, for those who really know the math, will the 16hp John Deere be able to make a little more power ( however calculated) than the Stihl Ms 880 chainsaw without major modifications or is there another powerplant out there that will do the job. What I am trying to avoid is the cost ($2000) and noise of the big chainsaw.
 
ThinkR said:
I guess what I am asking is, for those who really know the math, will the 16hp John Deere be able to make a little more power ( however calculated) than the Stihl Ms 880 chainsaw without major modifications or is there another powerplant out there that will do the job. What I am trying to avoid is the cost ($2000) and noise of the big chainsaw.
If you have a 16hp John Deere, it’s already about double the stock HP of that chainsaw?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jack action

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 120 ·
5
Replies
120
Views
25K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K