Prescriptive Vs Descriptive and Morality

[hypnagogue]

Originally posted by Royce
Your right, Dan. I did misread your post or misunderstood what you were saying. Having reread it, I still question it feeling good is enough to make something morally right. I can think of a number of experiences in our societythat are deemed morally right and do not feel good before during or after only necessary. I can also think of a number of experiences that may feel good but are morally bad in our society.

I think Dan's point is more that this pleasure/pain dichotomy can be viewed as the basis of morality. This does not entail that every moral action is accompanied by a good or bad feeling, only that its raison d'etre is ultimately grounded in the experience of pleasure and pain, and the associated good and bad. For instance, why is it moral to carry out a necessary action? Well, why is anything necessary in the first place? Because it helps perpetuate life. Why should we perpetuate life? Because life is good. Why is life good? And so we've come back to the association of goodness with pleasure. Indeed, it is hard to conceive of why we would view life as 'good' if we did not have some kind of emotional or aesthetic appreciation for it on some level.

The same line of reasoning goes for pleasurable experiences that are deemed morally bad; the only reason these activities are frowned upon is because they are also associated in some way with pain or badness, and society has decided that the bad components outweigh the good.

Stop and think about it. If we are morale people why should doing morally right make us feel anything at all. We would be doing only that which is natural or that which is part of our nature to do anyway.

This isn't a comment on your point as much as your logic. Isn't an artist just doing that which is natural to him or is part of his nature to do when he is engaged in the creative process? And isn't the creative process a very emotional one, indeed, isn't it driven by emotion?

 

[Dissident Dan]

Whether my fault or yours, Royce, I still don't think that you're getting what I'm meaning to say. It's not that something making you feel good is the basis for calling it moral, but rather that the effects of actions on pain/pleasure for all involved are the criteria upon which to judge moral actions.

Hypnagogue basically got it, although I, myself, didn't say anything about life itself being good.