Previously suppressed knowledge to control the masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter jake jot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Control Knowledge
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
jake jot
Messages
302
Reaction score
17
I need in my story some examples of previous knowledges or technology that were once kept suppressed in order to control the masses. For example. Flour (to keep people dependent on fruits or vegetables or produce)? Electricity? concept of Pressure? What can you think of? In modern times, knowledges of nuclear weapons were kept suppressed to avoid global annihilation. But at least we understood concepts of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jake jot said:
I need in my story some examples of previous knowledges or technology that were once kept suppressed in order to control the masses. For example. Flour (to keep people dependent on fruits or vegetables or produce)? Electricity? concept of Pressure? What can you think of? In modern times, knowledges of nuclear weapons were kept suppressed to avoid global annihilation. But at least we understood concepts of it.
Galileo discovered that Jupiter had moons. He was placed under house arrest.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jake jot
What else? Besides nuclear weapons?

Were there any medical doctors in the past who were burnt at the stakes? Or scientists?
 
<Post edited by mentor to remove unsupported allegations that are not germane to this thread.>

Suppression of information should have some kind of benefit to the perpetrator to drive that action. I think would have to be a big effort (involving large numbers of people in society), to be successful.
Targetting a communicationally isolated fraction of a society would be easier.
  • Money (as in proprietary)
  • Political power
  • Power over another person
  • Entrenching a point of view (opposing paradigmatic change, like Copernicus)
Are the reasons I could quickly think of that would seem to be strong enough to generate the activity of large numbers of people to take action.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jake jot