A Prime Number Powers of Integers and Fermat's Last Theorem

AI Thread Summary
Fermat's Last Theorem can be reduced to proving cases for odd primes and the number 4, as established from the n=4 case. The discussion raises a question about the implications of expressing terms like (c^x)^p, where c is an integer, x is even, and p is an odd prime, suggesting that this could complicate proving the theorem for odd primes. It is proposed that if c, a, and b are integers raised to an even power, they may not satisfy the conditions needed for Fermat's Last Theorem. The argument hinges on the idea that if no counterexamples exist for odd primes, then none can exist for any positive n. Ultimately, the focus remains on demonstrating the absence of counterexamples for odd primes and the number 4.
e2m2a
Messages
354
Reaction score
13
TL;DR Summary
Need understanding of an integer to a perfect power raised to the power of a prime number as it relates to Fermat's Last Theorem.
From my research I have found that since Fermat proved his last theorem for the n=4 case, one only needs to prove his theorem for the case where n=odd prime where c^n = a^n + b^n. But I am not clear on some points relating to this. For example, what if we have the term (c^x)^p, where c is an integer, x = even integer, and p = odd prime. Then we can express this term as c^(xp) and we would have c^(xp)=a^n +b^n. Clearly, xp is no longer an odd prime. So, does this mean to prove Fermat's Last Theorem for the case where n=odd prime, then neither of the bases c,a,b themselves can be an integer that is raised to an even numbered power?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If ##c^{xp}=a^{xp} +b^{xp}## is a counterexample for the exponent n=xp then ##(c^x)^p = (b^x)^p + (a^x)^p## is a counterexample with exponent p. If you can show that there is no counterexample for p then there can't be a counterexample for np for any positive n. It doesn't matter what a,b,c are.

Every integer larger than 2 is a multiple of an odd prime or a multiple of 4, so we only need to show that there are no counterexamples for odd primes and for the number 4.
 
  • Like
Likes pbuk and PeroK
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top