1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Probability - Equally likely outcomes

  1. Oct 6, 2012 #1

    CAF123

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    1) N people, including A and B, are randomly arranged in a line. Compute the probability that A and B sit next to each other.
    If instead they sit in a circle, compute the probability that A and B sit next to each other.

    3. The attempt at a solution
    To the first part, I got 2/N which is correct. My reasoning is:
    In the line, there are N! different rearrangements of the N people. Now glue A and B together, then you would be ordering (N-1)! people. Since A can sit to the left of B or B can sit to the left of A there are 2! additional rearrangments which gives a total probability of (since each rearrangment is equally likely as the rest) 2!(N-1)!/N! = 2/N
    Now for the circle: same as before, but instead I thought of 'wrapping' the line to make a circle. So A could be at the start of this line and B could be right at the other end. I believe this gives another 2! possiblilties which gives a total of 2!(N-1)! + 2! possibilities.
    Divide this by the sample space (N!) gives [tex] \frac{2((N-1)! +1)}{N!}. [/tex] I think the answer is supposed to be 2/(N-1). Can anyone see my error?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 6, 2012 #2

    Ray Vickson

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    For any location of A there are N-1 other locations B can occupy, and two of them are next to A.

    You might want to worry about why this same argument does NOT apply to the linear case!

    RGV
     
  4. Oct 6, 2012 #3

    CAF123

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Yes, this makes sense. In a row, if A is at the end, then B can only be in one possible place.
    What is wrong with my argument? I thought by adding another 2! rearrangements, I had covered this?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook