MHB Probability of Two Pairs in Five-Card Poker Hand

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexmahone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    hand
alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
What is the probability that a five-card poker hand contains two pairs (that is, two of each of two different ranks and a fifth card of a third rank)?

My attempt:

Let us first pick the 3 different ranks. There are [math]{13\choose 3}[/math] ways of doing this.
Out of each rank consisting of 4 suits, we must pick 2 cards, 2 cards and 1 card respectively.
So, no. of ways [math]={13\choose 3}\cdot {4\choose 2}\cdot {4\choose 2}\cdot {4\choose 1}[/math]

Total no. of ways of selecting a five-card poker hand [math]={52\choose 5}[/math]

[math]p=\dfrac{{13\choose 3}\cdot {4\choose 2}\cdot {4\choose 2}\cdot {4\choose 1}}{{52\choose 5}}[/math]

This doesn't match the answer given in the textbook. Where have I gone wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexmahone said:
What is the probability that a five-card poker hand contains two pairs (that is, two of each of two different ranks and a fifth card of a third rank)?

My attempt:

Let us first pick the 3 different ranks. There are [math]{13\choose 3}[/math] ways of doing this.
Out of each rank consisting of 4 suits, we must pick 2 cards, 2 cards and 1 card respectively.
So, no. of ways [math]={13\choose 3}\cdot {4\choose 2}\cdot {4\choose 2}\cdot {4\choose 1}[/math]

Total no. of ways of selecting a five-card poker hand [math]={52\choose 5}[/math]

[math]p=\dfrac{{13\choose 3}\cdot {4\choose 2}\cdot {4\choose 2}\cdot {4\choose 1}}{{52\choose 5}}[/math]

This doesn't match the answer given in the textbook. Where have I gone wrong?

If there are two pairs, then that already accounts for 4/5 cards in the hand. Let's break this up into the 4 cards that contain the pairs and the one card that doesn't.

There are 13 possible ranks, as you said, and we are picking 2 of them to match. We need 2,2 or 3,3, etc. Those kind of matches. Then for each of those 2 ranks they could be 1 of 4 possible suits. How would you express that?

Once you pick the two pairs, we need to pick the last card. How many ranks are left available?

(The $\binom{4}{2}$ terms and the $\binom{4}{1}$ term are all correct. You need to modify your first term and add one more term.)
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top