Problem of the Week # 163 - May 12, 2015

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2015
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on constructing a formal proof for the propositional statement $(P\to (Q\to R)) \leftrightarrow ((P\land Q)\to R)$ using a specified deductive system. Participants are encouraged to utilize Copi's 19 Rules or Natural Deduction for their proofs. The problem remains unanswered, highlighting the need for engagement in formal logic discussions. The lack of responses indicates a gap in understanding or interest in this specific topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of propositional logic and its symbols, including implications ($\to$), conjunctions ($\land$), and biconditionals ($\leftrightarrow$).
  • Familiarity with formal proof techniques, specifically Copi's 19 Rules or Natural Deduction.
  • Basic knowledge of logical equivalences and how to manipulate logical statements.
  • Experience with mathematical reasoning and proof construction.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Copi's 19 Rules for formal proofs in propositional logic.
  • Learn Natural Deduction techniques for constructing logical arguments.
  • Explore logical equivalences and their applications in formal proofs.
  • Practice constructing formal proofs with various propositional statements to enhance understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, logic enthusiasts, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of formal proofs in propositional logic.

Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

Construct a formal proof of the following propositional statement: $(P\to (Q\to R)) \leftrightarrow ((P\land Q)\to R)$. Here $\to$ means "implies", $\leftrightarrow$ means "if and only if", and $\land$ means "and". Make sure to mention what deductive system you are using (Copi's 19 Rules, Natural Deduction, etc.).

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's POTW. Here is my solution:

This is a Fitch-style proof using natural deduction.

View attachment 4383
 

Attachments

  • Second Logic Problem.png
    Second Logic Problem.png
    6.5 KB · Views: 115

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K