Problem of the Week # 210 - April 5, 2016

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2016
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Problem of the Week #210, which involves a set of real numbers, S, that is closed under multiplication. The problem requires demonstrating that at least one of the disjoint subsets T or U, which together form S, is also closed under multiplication, given that the product of any three elements from T remains in T and the same holds for U. This problem is derived from the 1995 William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition, with solutions provided by participants Fallen Angel and Deveno.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and properties of sets
  • Knowledge of real number operations and closure properties
  • Familiarity with mathematical competition problems
  • Basic principles of proof techniques in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of closed sets in algebraic structures
  • Explore the principles of the William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition
  • Learn about the implications of closure under multiplication in set theory
  • Investigate proof techniques used in combinatorial mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and competitive math enthusiasts interested in advanced problem-solving techniques and set theory applications.

Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

Let $S$ be a set of real numbers which is closed under multiplication (that is, if $a$ and $b$ are in $S$, then so is $ab$). Let $T$ and $U$ be disjoint subsets of $S$ whose union is $S$. Given that the product of any three (not necessarily distinct) elements of $T$ is in $T$ and that the product of any three elements of $U$ is in $U$, show that at least one of the two subsets $T,U$ is closed under multiplication.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Problem Of The Week # 210 - April 5, 2016

This was Problem A-1 in the 1995 William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition.

Congratulations to Fallen Angel and Deveno for their correct solutions! Here is Fallen Angel's solution:

Let's prove it by contradiction.

Suppose neither $U$ nor $T$ is closed under multiplication; i.e., there exists $a,b\in T$ such that $n=ab\in U$ and $x,y\in U$ such that $m=xy\in T$.

Now $nxy\in U$ because they all are in $U$, and similarly $abm\in T$. But $abm=nxy,$ so $U$ and $T$ are not disjoint, contrary to our assumption.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K