Problem of the Week #65 - June 24th, 2013

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Problem of the Week #65, which involves applying d'Alembert's solution to the boundary value problem of a vibrating string. The problem specifically requires demonstrating that if both functions \(f\) and \(g\) are symmetric about \(x=\frac{L}{2}\), then the relationship \(u\left(x,t+\frac{L}{c}\right)=-u(x,t)\) holds for all \(00\). No participants provided solutions, highlighting a lack of engagement with this mathematical concept.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Partial Differential Equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with d'Alembert's solution for vibrating strings
  • Knowledge of odd extensions in mathematical functions
  • Basic principles of boundary value problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of d'Alembert's solution for vibrating strings
  • Explore the properties of symmetric functions in boundary value problems
  • Learn about odd and even function extensions in mathematical analysis
  • Investigate the implications of time shifts in solutions to PDEs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and educators interested in the application of PDEs, particularly in the context of wave equations and boundary conditions.

Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Thanks again to those who participated in last week's POTW! Here's this week's problem!

-----

Background Info: From PDEs, d'Alembert's solution to the boundary value problem of the vibrating string
\[\left\{\begin{array}{l} \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}=c^2\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial x^2},\qquad 0<x<L,\,\, t>0\\ u(0,t)=0\text{ and }u(L,t)=0\text{ for all $t>0$}\\ u(x,0)=f(x)\text{ and }u_t(x,0)=g(x)\text{ for $0<x<L$}\end{array}\right.\]
is given by
\[u(x,t)=\frac{1}{2}\left[f^{\ast}(x-ct)+f^{\ast}(x+ct)\right]+\frac{1}{2c}\int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} g^{\ast}(s)\,ds,\]
where $f^{\ast}$ and $g^{\ast}$ are the odd extensions of $f$ and $g$ respectively.

Problem: Suppose that both $f$ and $g$ are symmetric about $x=\frac{L}{2}$; that is, $f(L-x)=f(x)$ and $g(L-x)=g(x)$. Show that
\[u\left(x,t+\frac{L}{c}\right)=-u(x,t)\]
for all $0<x<L$ and $t>0$.

-----

 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's question. You can find my solution below.
Proof: We note here that $f^{\ast}$ and $g^{\ast}$ are both odd $2L$-periodic functions and also satisfy the symmetry relations $f^{\ast}(L-x)=f^{\ast}(x)$ and $g^{\ast}(L-x)=g^{\ast}(x)$ (which they inherit from $f$ and $g$). With this, we see that
\[\begin{aligned} u\left(x,t+\frac{L}{c}\right) &= \frac{1}{2}\left[f^{\ast} \left(x-c\left(t+\frac{L}{c}\right)\right) + f^{\ast}\left(x+c\left(t+\frac{L}{c}\right)\right)\right] + \frac{1}{2c}\int_{x-c\left(t+\frac{L}{c}\right)}^{ x+c\left(t+\frac{L}{c}\right)} g^{\ast}(s)\,ds\\ &= \frac{1}{2}\left[ f^{\ast}(-(L-(x-ct))) + f^{\ast}(L-(-x-ct))\right] + \frac{1}{2c}\int_{x-ct-L}^{x+ct+L} g^{\ast}(s)\,ds\\ &= \frac{1}{2} \left[ -f^{\ast}(L-(x-ct)) + f^{\ast}(L - (-x - ct)) \right] + \frac{1}{2c} \int_{x-ct-L}^{x+ct+L} g^{\ast}(s)\,ds\\ &= \frac{1}{2} \left[ -f^{\ast}(x-ct) + f^{\ast}(-x-ct)\right] + \frac{1}{2c}\int_{x-ct-L}^{x+ct+L} g^{\ast}(s)\,ds\\
&= \frac{1}{2}\left[ -f^{\ast}(x-ct)- f^{\ast}(x+ct)\right] + \frac{1}{2c}\int_{x-ct}^{x+ct+2L} g^{\ast}(s+L)\,ds\\ &= -\frac{1}{2}\left[ f^{\ast}(x-ct) + f^{\ast}(x+ct)\right] +\frac{1}{2c} \int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} -g^{\ast}(-s-L)\,ds\\ &= -\frac{1}{2} \left[f^{\ast}(x+ct)+ f^{\ast}(x-ct)\right] - \frac{1}{2c}\int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} g^{\ast}(-s-L+2L)\,ds\\ &= -\frac{1}{2}\left[f^{\ast}(x+ct)+f^{\ast} (x-ct) \right] - \frac{1}{2c}\int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} g^{\ast}(L-s)\,ds\\ &= -\left(\frac{1}{2}\left[ f^{\ast}(x+ct)+ f^{\ast}(x-ct)\right] + \frac{1}{2c}\int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} g^{\ast}(s)\,ds\right) \\ &= -u(x,t),\end{aligned}\]
Thus, $u\left(x,t+\dfrac{L}{c}\right)= -u(x,t)$.$\hspace{.25in}\blacksquare$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
496
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K