Problem of the Week #93 - March 10th, 2014

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The problem discusses the characterization of one-parameter groups in the special linear group $SL_n$. It establishes that these groups can be represented as homomorphisms of the form $t \to e^{tA}$, where $A$ is a real $n \times n$ matrix with a trace of zero. A supporting lemma is provided, demonstrating that for any square matrix $A$, the relationship $\exp(\mathrm{tr}\,A) = \det \exp(A)$ holds true. The proof shows that if $\mathrm{tr}\,A = 0$, then $\det\exp(tA) = 1$, confirming that $\exp(tA)$ is indeed a one-parameter group in $SL_n$. Conversely, if the determinant condition holds for all $t$, it implies that the trace of $A$ must also be zero.
Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Here's this week's problem!

-----

Problem
: Show that the one-parameter groups in $SL_n$ are the homomorphisms $t\to e^{tA}$, where $A$ is a real $n\times n$ matrix whose trace is zero.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's problem. You can find the solution below.

[sp]We begin with a lemma.

Lemma: For any square matrix $A$, $\exp(\mathrm{tr}\,A)=\det \exp(A)$

Proof of Lemma: If $\mathbf{x}$ is an eigenvector of $A$ with eigenvalue $\lambda$, then it is also an eigenvector of $\exp(A)$ with eigenvalue $\exp(\lambda)$. So, if $\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_n$ are eigenvalues of $A$, then the eigenvalues of $\exp(A)$ are $\exp(\lambda_i)$. The trace of $A$ is the sum $\lambda_1+\ldots+\lambda_n$, and the determinant of $\exp(A)$ is the product $\exp(\lambda_1)\cdot\ldots\cdot\exp(\lambda_n)$. Therefore, $\exp(\mathrm{tr}\,A) = \exp(\lambda_1+\ldots+\lambda_n) = \exp(\lambda_1)\cdot\ldots\cdot\exp(\lambda_n) = \det \exp(A)$.$\hspace{0.25in}\blacksquare$

We now go ahead and prove the main result.

Proof: The lemma shows that if $\mathrm{tr}\,A=0$, then $\det\exp(tA) = \exp(t\,\mathrm{tr}\,A) = \exp(0) = 1$ for all $t$, so $\exp(tA)$ is a one-parameter group in $SL_n$. Conversely, if $\det\exp(t A)=1$ for all $t$, the derivative of $\exp(t\,\mathrm{tr}\,A)$, evaluated at $t=0$, is zero. But $\left.\dfrac{d}{dt}\right|_{t=0}\exp(t\,\mathrm{tr}\,A)=\mathrm{tr}\, A$ and thus we have $\mathrm{tr}\,A = 0$. $\hspace{.25in}\blacksquare$[/sp]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K