Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Problem solving 2nd order ODE not for the faint of heart

  1. Apr 9, 2008 #1
    Problem solving 2nd order ODE...not for the faint of heart!!

    Hey folks,

    I'm having problems solving the following set of ODE's:

    [tex]3H_a^2+H_b^2+6H_aH_b=k_1\rho[/tex] eq.1

    [tex]\dot{H_a}+3H_a^2+2H_aH_b=k_2\rho[/tex] eq.2

    [tex]\dot{H_b}+2H_b^2+3H_aH_b=k_3\rho[/tex] eq.3

    These are cosmological equations. Note, [itex]\rho=\frac{1}{b^6}(1-b^2+b^4)[/itex], also the H's are Hubbles constant in a and b, eg



    The a's and b's are functions of t (time) and the k's on the RHS are just constants. I want to put this all together and ultimately plot a as a function of t and b as a function of t.

    The equations originate from the paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/0707.1062 , equations 9,10,11 and I am trying to duplicate the plots in fig1.

    What I'm thinking:

    Solve eqtn 1 for [itex]H_a[H_a] using the quadratic eqtn then plug that into 3 and use DSOLVE in mathematica.

    Can anyone let me know if this is the correct approach.

    Thanks in advance!!

    Last edited: Apr 9, 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 9, 2008 #2
    Actually I tried the above

    and mathematica tells me Solve::svars: Equations may not give solutions for all "solve" variables
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Problem solving 2nd order ODE not for the faint of heart