Product of two exponentials of different operators

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cpsinkule
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators Product
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the expression for the product of two exponentials of different operators, specifically the relation eAeB = eA + Be[A,B]/2. Participants are seeking a proof of this relation, which is referenced in quantum mechanics literature but not fully explained.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in proving the relation using series expansion and seeks clarification.
  • Another participant suggests looking into the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula as a potential avenue for understanding the relation.
  • It is noted that the formula may only hold under certain conditions, specifically if A and B commute with their commutator [A,B].
  • References to specific quantum mechanics texts, such as Cohen-Tannoudji and Sakurai, are made, indicating that proofs or partial proofs may be found in those sources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the proof of the relation, and multiple views on the applicability and conditions of the formula are presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependency on the commutation relations of the operators A and B, as well as the specific conditions under which the formula is valid.

cpsinkule
Messages
174
Reaction score
24
How does one show that
eAeB=eA+Be[A,B]/2
where A,B are operators and [ , ] is the commutator. The QM book I am using states it as a fact without proof, but I would like to see how it is proved. I've muddled around with the series expansion, but can't get farther than a few term by term products which lead nowhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Search for ."Baker-Campbell-Hausdorf" formula.
 
Do note that the formula only works if A and B commute with [A,B]. I think ther eis a proof in the Cohen-Tannoudji book
 
Its in Sakurai's Modern Quantum Mechanics and indeed its Baker-Campbell-Hausdorf formula.
If i remember good then there is a proof or at least a partial proof in Sakurai.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
892
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K