Product state and orthorgonality

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KFC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product State
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the orthogonality of quantum states |0, e⟩ and |1, g⟩ for a two-level atom trapped in a cavity. It establishes that these states are orthogonal based on the inner product calculations, specifically showing that ⟨0, e|1, g⟩ equals zero. The interpretation of the density operator ρ(t) is also addressed, confirming that if the atom is in the excited state, the probability of measuring it in the ground state is zero, reinforcing the orthogonality of the states. This conclusion is supported by the mathematical definitions provided in the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically two-level systems
  • Familiarity with quantum state notation and inner products
  • Knowledge of density operators and their interpretation in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of orthogonality in Hilbert spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of density operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about orthogonality in quantum state spaces
  • Explore the implications of photon states in quantum cavities
  • Investigate the mathematical framework of quantum state measurements
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and students studying quantum state properties and measurements will benefit from this discussion.

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
For two level atom trapped in a box (or cavity), initially at excited state without any photon inside, all possible states are

|0, e\rangle =|0\rangle|e\rangle \qquad and \qquad |1, g\rangle = |1\rangle|g\rangle

e stands for excitated state, g stands for ground state.

Obviously,

\langle 0, e|0, e\rangle = 1

and

\langle 1, g|1, g\rangle = 1

I wonder if these two states |0, e\rangle and |1\rangle|g\rangle are orthorgonal? Why?

By the way, if I know the density operator at time T be \rho(t), how to interpret \langle 0, e|\rho(t)|1, g\rangle and \langle 1, g|\rho(t)|0, e\rangle
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if the atom is known to be in the excited state, the probability that it you could measure it in the ground state is 0, right? If so, that means the two states are orthogonal. Similarly, if you know that the box is in the one-photon state, the probability of measuring zero photons in the box is 0, so those two states are orthogonal.
 
KFC said:
I wonder if these two states |0, e\rangle and |1\rangle|g\rangle are orthorgonal? Why?
The definition of \langle 0,e|1,g\rangle is

\langle 0,e|1,g\rangle=\langle e|\otimes\langle 0|\Big(|1\rangle\otimes|g\rangle\Big)=\langle 0|1\rangle\langle e|g\rangle

and what diazona said explains why both factors on the right are zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K