MHB Program for Approximating nth root of a Number

  • Thread starter Thread starter annie122
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Program Root
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on implementing Newton's method in C to approximate the nth root of a number, specifically addressing convergence and termination conditions. Convergence is defined as achieving a difference between approximations that can be made arbitrarily small. The program should terminate either after 100 iterations or when the difference between successive approximations is less than 0.000001. A suggested approach to check for convergence without knowing the true root is to compare the current approximation with the previous one. The conversation also explores estimating the error in approximations to ensure accuracy in the results.
annie122
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I have a question for a programming exercise I'm working on for C.

The problem is to "Write a program that uses Newton's method to approximate the nth root of a number to six decimal places." The problem also said to terminate after 100 trials if it failed to converge.

Q1. What does "converge" mean?
Does it mean the difference between two approximation can be made as small as I like?

Q2. On what condition should the program terminate?
There are two such conditions: 1) if the loop has been executed 100 times, 2) the difference between the "true" answer and the approximation is less than 0.000001.
I know how to set 1), but how should I express 2)?
Right now, I am setting the condition as
|approximation - root| < 0.00001,
but I feel it's kind of cheating, because I'm not supposed to know the real answer if I'm making approximations.
Are there any other any ways to express the condition, especially one involving the function f(x) = x^n - c (x is the nth root of c)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: question on program for approximating nth root of a number

Hi Yuuki! :)

Yuuki said:
I have a question for a programming exercise I'm working on for C.

The problem is to "Write a program that uses Newton's method to approximate the nth root of a number to six decimal places." The problem also said to terminate after 100 trials if it failed to converge.

Q1. What does "converge" mean?
Does it mean the difference between two approximation can be made as small as I like

Yes. Basically.
More specifically, that you can get as close to the nth root as you want by just taking enough trials.

Q2. On what condition should the program terminate?
There are two such conditions: 1) if the loop has been executed 100 times, 2) the difference between the "true" answer and the approximation is less than 0.000001.
I know how to set 1), but how should I express 2)?
Right now, I am setting the condition as
|approximation - root| < 0.00001,
but I feel it's kind of cheating, because I'm not supposed to know the real answer if I'm making approximations.
Are there any other any ways to express the condition, especially one involving the function f(x) = x^n - c (x is the nth root of c)?

Exactly. You're not supposed to use the real root.
But what you can do is setting the condition as for instance
$$|\text{approximation} - \text{previous approximation}| < 0.0000001$$
If you achieve that, it is unlikely that the first 6 decimal digits will change in more iterations.
 
Re: question on program for approximating nth root of a number

Thanks. :)

I set a new variable root0 to store the previous approximation, and set the condition as you said.
It worked beautifully.
 
It is possible to estimate the error in an iterate directly (assuming it small anyway).

Let $$x$$ be the 6-th root of $$k$$ and $$x_n$$ an estimate of $$x$$ with error $$\varepsilon_n$$ such that:

$$x=x_n+\varepsilon_n$$

Then raising this to the 6-th power gives:

$$x^6=x_n^6 + 6 \varepsilon_n x_n^5 + O(\varepsilon_n^2)$$

Now ignoring second and higher order terms in $$\varepsilon$$ and rearranging we get:

$$\varepsilon_n=\frac{x_n^6-x^6}{6x_n^5}=\frac{x_n^6-k}{6x_n^5}$$

OK let's look at an example: Take $$k=66$$, and $$x_n=2$$, so $$x_n^6=64$$, then

$$\varepsilon_n=\frac{66-64}{6\times32}\approx 0.01042$$

which compares nicely with $$66^{1/6}=2.01028...$$

The above is very similar (for similar read identical) to computing the next iterate and taking the difference of the iterates as an estimate of the error in the first.
 
Last edited:
zzephod said:
It is possible to estimate the error in an iterate directly (assuming it small anyway).

It is also possible to specify an upper boundary for the remaining error in a specific iteration (in this specific case).

First off, after the first (positive) iteration, all iterations are guaranteed to be above the root.
The remaining error in those iterations is guaranteed to be less than the change in the approximation.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
439
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top