Projectile Motion: Using an arrow to shoot a coconut dropped by a monkey

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving an archer shooting an arrow at a coconut dropped by a monkey. The participants explore the relationships between the initial speed of the arrow, the angle of projection, the height of the monkey, and the time it takes for the arrow to hit the coconut.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants analyze the equations of motion for both the arrow and the falling coconut, questioning the implications of gravity on the trajectory and timing of the arrow's flight.
  • Some participants discuss the impact of shooting the arrow from ground level and the assumptions made regarding the initial height of the monkey.
  • There are inquiries about the time taken for the arrow to reach the coconut under different conditions, such as the hypothetical scenario of no gravity.
  • Several participants suggest reconsidering the relationships between horizontal distance, initial speed, and angle of projection in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationships between the variables, but no consensus has been reached on the specific calculations or interpretations of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem requires treating the initial height of the monkey as a known input, while also recognizing the need to find the initial speed of the arrow. There is a mention of constraints related to the possibility of the coconut hitting the ground before the arrow reaches it.

songoku
Messages
2,512
Reaction score
394
Homework Statement
A person on ground wants to shoot coconut hold by monkey sitting on tree at certain height from the ground. He shoots the arrow at angle 35 degree with respect to horizontal at the same time the monkey drops the coconut. Given that the arrow hits the coconut 1 second after the shot, find (in any order) the initial speed of arrow and the height of monkey from ground
Relevant Equations
Projectile Motion
Let:
##x## = horizontal distance from person to tree
##h_t## = height where arrow hits the coconut (measured from ground)
##h_o## = height of monkey
##u## = initial speed of arrow
##\theta = 35^0##
##t = 1~ \text{s}##

Vertical displacement of coconut until it is hit:
$$h_t - h_o = -\frac{1}{2} g t^2 = -\frac{1}{2} (9.81) (1^2)=-4.905...(1)$$

Horizontal distance traveled by arrow:
$$x=u ~\text{cos} ~\theta . t=u ~\text{cos} ~35^0...(2)$$

Height of arrow when hits coconut:
$$h_t = u~ \text{sin} ~\theta . t - \frac{1}{2}gt^2$$
$$h_t=u~ \text{sin} ~35^0 - 4.905...(3)$$

Substitute (3) to (1):
$$u ~\text{sin} ~35^0-4.905-h_o=-4.905$$
$$u ~\text{sin} ~35^0=h_o$$

Then I am stuck.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have not used the fact that the arrow is shot from ground level.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
haruspex said:
You have not used the fact that the arrow is shot from ground level.
I think I have used that in this part:

songoku said:
Height of arrow when hits coconut:
$$h_t = u~ \text{sin} ~\theta . t - \frac{1}{2}gt^2$$
$$h_t=u~ \text{sin} ~35^0 - 4.905...(3)$$

The LHS should be: final height of arrow - initial height of arrow and because initial height = 0 the LHS is only final height of arrow

Or maybe you mean I have to use that fact on other part of my working?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
songoku said:
I think I have used that in this part:
Sorry, you're right.

Ok. so suppose we have some solution. What happens if we double x? We would have to double u to keep the time the same, and double ho. ho-ht would remain the same. And that's it; all the given data still applies.

So you do not have enough info.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and songoku
Thank you very much haruspex
 
songoku said:
Thank you very much haruspex
I wonder whether the time taken to hit the coconut is the same as it would be if there were no gravity? If the arrow moved in a straight line and the coconut didn't fall?
 
PeroK said:
I wonder whether the time taken to hit the coconut is the same as it would be if there were no gravity? If the arrow moved in a straight line and the coconut didn't fall?
Depends what you allow to vary. It's fixed by u, θ, x.
 
PeroK said:
I wonder whether the time taken to hit the coconut is the same as it would be if there were no gravity? If the arrow moved in a straight line and the coconut didn't fall?
I think that the time taken would not be the same, because the straight line path is shorter than the curved trajectory, right?
 
sysprog said:
I think that the time taken would not be the same, because the straight line path is shorter than the curved trajectory, right?
If the horizontal distance and horizontal velocity are unchanged then the time is the same.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
If the horizontal distance and horizontal velocity are unchanged then the time is the same.
How would the horizontal velocity be unchanged, if the archer has to aim at a non-horizontal upward angle when there is gravity, and can aim along a non-arched exactly horizontal path when there is no gravity?
 
  • #11
sysprog said:
How would the horizontal velocity be unchanged, if the archer has to aim at a non-horizontal upward angle when there is gravity, and can aim along a non-arched exactly horizontal path when there is no gravity?
If the solution is independent of ##g##, then we could set ##g = 0##.
 
  • #12
PeroK said:
If the solution is independent of ##g##, then we could set ##g = 0##.
Wouldn't that eliminate the necessity of the curve, and thereby reduce the length of the path along which the arrow travels, and consequently reduce the time it takes for it to reach the target?
 
  • #13
sysprog said:
How would the horizontal velocity be unchanged, if the archer has to aim at a non-horizontal upward angle when there is gravity, and can aim along a non-arched exactly horizontal path when there is no gravity?
There is no horizontal trajectory option.
The coconut starts at elevation angle θ above above the archer, i.e. at height ##x\sin(\theta)##. The arrow is aimed at the same elevation. The coconut is released at the instant the arrow is released, speed u.
Without gravity, the coconut doesn't move and the arrow travels in a straight line to hit it.
With gravity, the arrow travels in a parabola and hits it.
In both cases, the time taken is ##\frac{x}{u\cos(\theta)}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
  • #14
haruspex said:
There is no horizontal trajectory option.
Let's please suppose that there were such an option ##-## the archer's boss has given him a 'gravity on-off' button, and with no gravity, our archer presumably would find it easy enough to 'ascend' a parallel tree.

Now, supposing that he is in the tree, and at 180 degrees (exactly horizontal) to the target, he has the option to use the button to activate the 'gravity on' or gravity off' condition:

If the target is at such a great distance that, with the 'gravity on' condition active, the arrow will not reach it, unless the archer aims at a 45 degree upward angle (so that (by the law of cosines) gravity is active over only 70.71% of the horizontal distance) and he can then still hit the target; however, with gravity off, distance is not a concern, and the archer can aim at 0 (in this context otherwise called minus 180) degrees ##-## wouldn't the arrow reach the target sooner with 'gravity off' active?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
sysprog said:
Let's please suppose that there were such an option ##-## the archer's boss has given him a 'gravity on-off' button, and with no gravity, our archer presumably would find it easy enough to 'ascend' a parallel tree.

Now, supposing that he is in the tree, and at 180 degrees to the target, he has the option to use the button to activate the 'gravity on' or gravity off' condition:

If the target is at such a great distance that, with the 'gravity on' condition active, the arrow will not reach it, unless the archer aims at a 45 degree upward angle (so that (by the law of cosines) gravity is active over only 70.71% of the horizontal distance) and he can then still hit the target; however, with gravity off, distance is not a concern, and the archer can aim at 0 (in this context otherwise called minus 180) degrees ##-## wouldn't the arrow reach the target sooner with 'gravity off' active?
Where do you aim to hit the coconut? Should ##\theta = \alpha##, where ##\theta## is the angle of the projectile and ##\alpha## is the angle of elevation of the coconut?

Do the calculations, please.

Does the answer depend on ##g##? What if ##g = 5m/s^2## or ##g = 1m/s^2## or ##g = 0.00001m/s^2##.

Do the calculations please.

Can you study the problem in an accelerating reference frame, falling at ##g##? In that frame do you have straight-line motion that results in the same answer as above?

PS if there is a possibility of the coconut hitting the ground before the arrow reaches it, then we need to factor that into the constraints of the problem.
 
  • #16
haruspex said:
So you do not have enough info.
As I read the problem, we are are expected to treat the initial height of the monkey (##h_0## using OP's convention) above the ground as a known input. We would then be expected to produce a result written in terms of ##h_0##.

Edit: But that can't be right as @kuruman points out. The problem statement asks for a calculation of ##h_0##.

@PeroK has been giving strong hints about the relevance of gravity to the problem.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #17
jbriggs444 said:
As I read the problem, we are are expected to treat the initial height of the monkey (h0 using OP's convention) above the ground as a known input. We would then be expected to produce a result written in terms of h0.
And since the problem is asking to "find (in any order) the initial speed of arrow and the height of monkey from ground", OP has first "found" the height to be ##h_0## and must now look for the speed. Or is it that OP found the speed first and must now look for the height? OP's equation ##u ~\text{sin} ~35^0=h_o## in post #1 says it all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
  • #18
sysprog said:
Let's please suppose that there were such an option ##-## the archer's boss has given him a 'gravity on-off' button, and with no gravity, our archer presumably would find it easy enough to 'ascend' a parallel tree.
Then this has nothing to do with the context of your post #8 or my post #9. I see no benefit in discussing it further.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K