Undergrad Projection Operators: Pi, Pj, δij in Quantum Mechanics

Click For Summary
In quantum mechanics, the projection operator Pi is defined as Pi = |i><i|. The relationship PiPj = |i><i|j><j| simplifies to (δij)Pj, where δij represents the inner product of states |i> and |j>. The discussion highlights the mathematical transition from the second to the third result, emphasizing that once δij is established, |i> can be replaced with |j> without altering the outcome. This leads to the conclusion that Pi can be interchanged with Pj in the final expression, affirming the flexibility of these operators in quantum mechanics. The conversation suggests that such equalities may be further explored in Shankar's text.
RohanJ
Messages
18
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Product of two projection operators
In Principles of Quantum mechanics by shankar it is written that
Pi is a projection operator and Pi=|i> <i|.
Then PiPj= |i> <i|j> <j|= (δij)Pj.
I don't understand how we got from the second result toh the third one mathematically.I know that the inner product of i and j can be written as δijbut how do we get to Pj in the final result from the second result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Once you get the ##\delta_{ij}##, you can change ##|i\rangle## to ##|j\rangle##:
$$
\delta_{ij} |i\rangle \langle j| = \delta_{ij} |j\rangle \langle j|
$$
 
DrClaude said:
Once you get the ##\delta_{ij}##, you can change ##|i\rangle## to ##|j\rangle##:
$$
\delta_{ij} |i\rangle \langle j| = \delta_{ij} |j\rangle \langle j|
$$
I was thinking that only. That means I can write Pi in place of Pj in the final result too and it won't make a difference.
Am I right?
 
RohanJ said:
I was thinking that only. That means I can write Pi in place of Pj in the final result too and it won't make a difference.
Am I right?
Right. This is not the only equality that is valid here. I don't have Shankar's book with me at the moment, but it can be that he uses that particular form later to make a point.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
933
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K