Proof By Induction (difficult problem)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around using mathematical induction to prove that for integers n ≥ 2, the expression (x+1)^n - nx - 1 is divisible by x^2. The initial steps include verifying the base case for n=2 and assuming the statement holds for n=k. The user expresses confusion while attempting to prove the case for n=k+1, particularly at a critical step involving factoring. A suggestion is made to factor out (x+1) and relate the remaining terms to the assumption made at the kth step, clarifying that m should be treated as a polynomial in x rather than a constant integer. The conversation concludes with the user expressing gratitude for the clarification.
Dish
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I'm just totally stumped by this Q

Use mathematical induction to prove that for integer n, n > or = to 2,
(x+1)^n - nx - 1 is divisible by x^2.

It's not a Homework problem.

Attempt at solution:

1) Prove for n =2,
(x+1)^2 - 2x - 1 = x^2 + 2x +1 - 2x -1 = x^2
2) Assume true for n = k
thus (x+1)^k -kx -1 = m x^2 where m is any integer
3) Prove for n = k+1

(x+1)^(k+1) - (k+1)x - 1
(x+1)^k . (x+1) - kx - x - 1
(x+1)^k - kx -1 + x(x+1)^k - x - 1
m.x^2 + x(x+1)^k - x -1

from here on i am totally confused. :S
Please can someone help me to finish the proof, so that it's divisible by x^2?
Thank you :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Dish said:
Hey guys, I'm just totally stumped by this Q

Use mathematical induction to prove that for integer n, n > or = to 2,
(x+1)^n - nx - 1 is divisible by x^2.

It's not a Homework problem.

Attempt at solution:

1) Prove for n =2,
(x+1)^2 - 2x - 1 = x^2 + 2x +1 - 2x -1 = x^2
2) Assume true for n = k
thus (x+1)^k -kx -1 = m x^2 where m is any integer
3) Prove for n = k+1

(x+1)^(k+1) - (k+1)x - 1
(x+1)^k . (x+1) - kx - x - 1
(x+1)^k - kx -1 + x(x+1)^k - x - 1
m.x^2 + x(x+1)^k - x -1

At the bold line, you can factor out (x+1) from some of the terms so that you have (x+1)(\mbox{something})+(\mbox{something else}). Look at the "something" carefully & think how you can relate it to your kth step. Plugging that relation in for the "something", you should be able to then expand things and get the result of x^2*(stuff).

By the way, your assumption that at the kth step (x+1)^k -kx - 1 = mx^2, where m is an integer, is incorrect. m can be a polynomial in x.
 
argh Thanks I get it now, thanks for the help
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
765
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K