I'm working out a problem that requires me to proof a result by induction. I have worked out what I think is a correct proof, but I would like for somebody to look over it and give me feedback.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Part 1: Give a reasonable definition of the symbol [tex]\sum_{k = m}^{m + n}{a}_{k}[/tex]

I first define:

[tex]

\sum_{k = m}^{m}{a}_{k} = {a }_{ m}

[/tex]

Then assuming I have defined [tex]\sum_{k = m}^{n}{a}_{k}[/tex] for a fixed n >= m, I further defined:

[tex] \sum_{ k=m}^{n+1 } {a }_{k } =( \sum_{k=m }^{ n} { a}_{ k} )+ { a}_{n+1 } [/tex]

Part 2 requires me to prove by induction that for all n >= 1, we have the assertion (call it A(n)):

[tex]\sum_{k=n+1 }^{ 2n} \frac{1 }{k } = \sum_{ m=1}^{ 2n} \frac{ {(-1) }^{m+1 } }{m } [/tex]

I approach this problem as I would have any proof by induction. The base case A(1) is true so I won't write it out here. Now, assuming the assertion is true for some k:

[tex] \frac{ 1}{ k+1} + \frac{1 }{k+2 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{ 2k} = 1 - \frac{ 1}{2 } + \frac{1 }{3 } - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...+ \frac{ {(-1) }^{2k+1 } }{ 2k} [/tex]

where the last term on the RHS simplifies to [tex]- \frac{ 1}{2k } [/tex].

I have to show that A(k+1) is true:

(*)[tex]\frac{ 1}{ k+2} + \frac{1 }{k+3 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{ 2(k+1)} = 1 - \frac{ 1}{2 } + \frac{1 }{3 } - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...+ \frac{ {(-1) }^{2(k+1)+1 } }{ 2(k+1)} [/tex]

where the last term on the RHS simplifies to [tex]- \frac{1 }{ 2(k+1)} [/tex]

Starting with A(k), I add [tex] \frac{1 }{ 2k+1} + \frac{ 1}{ 2k+2} - \frac{ 1}{ k+1} [/tex] to each side and obtain:

[tex]\frac{ 1}{k+1 } + \frac{ 1}{k+2 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{2k } - \frac{1 }{k+1 } + \frac{1 }{ 2k+1} + \frac{1 }{2k+2 } =1- \frac{ 1}{ 2} + \frac{ 1}{ 3} - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...- \frac{1 }{2k+2 } - \frac{1 }{ k+1} + \frac{ 1}{ 2k+1} + \frac{1 }{2k+2 }

[/tex]

After subtracting out the two like terms on each side, the left hand side becomes the sum

[tex] \sum_{ k=(n+1)+1}^{ 2(n+1)} \frac{1 }{k } [/tex]

and the terms [tex] \frac{ 1}{ 2k+2}- \frac{ 1}{ k+1} [/tex] on the right simplify to [tex] \frac{ -1}{2(k+1) } [/tex], so the right side resembles the right side in (*). Therefore, the RHS becomes the sum [tex] \sum_{ m=1}^{2(n+1) } \frac{ {(-1) }^{m+1} }{2m } [/tex]

I'm wasn't sure if I was supposed to use the definition of part 1 in part 2 and I didn't, but I'm wondering if that would have made things easier. Thanks.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

# Proof by induction of a problem

Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email,
Google+,
Twitter, or
Facebook

Have something to add?

- Similar discussions for: Proof by induction of a problem

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**