Proof of Bounded Set without Max or Min: (0,2) in (0,2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter fishturtle1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The set (0,2) is a bounded set that lacks both a maximum and a minimum. The proof establishes that for any element s in (0,2), the inequality 0 < s < (2+s)/2 < 2 holds, leading to a contradiction if s were to be considered a maximum. Similarly, by assuming h as a minimum, the argument shows that 0 < h < 2 leads to the conclusion that h cannot be a minimum. Thus, (0,2) is confirmed as a bounded set without maximum or minimum values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bounded sets in real analysis
  • Familiarity with the concepts of maximum and minimum in sets
  • Knowledge of inequalities and their properties
  • Basic visualization skills for number lines and intervals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of open intervals in real analysis
  • Learn about the completeness property of real numbers
  • Explore examples of bounded and unbounded sets
  • Investigate the implications of the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, educators teaching concepts of bounded sets, and anyone interested in the foundational properties of intervals in the real number system.

fishturtle1
Messages
393
Reaction score
82

Homework Statement


Give an example of a bounded set that has neither a maximum nor a minimum. (The proof below is given by the book).

We claim that the set ##(0,2)## is bounded and has neither a maximum nor a minimum.

Proof: For each ##x \epsilon (0,2)##, we know that ##0 < x < 2##. Therefore 0 is a lower bound of the set and 2 is an upper bound. Thus, (0,2) is bounded. To see that it has no maximum, suppose to the contrary that ##s## is a maximum of the set ##(0,2)##. Then, by definition of maximum, s must be in the set ##(0,2)##. But
##0 < s < \frac {2+s}{2} < 2## and therefore ##\frac {2+s}{2}## is in the set (0,2) and larger than s, a contradiction. In a similar fashion, you can check that there is no minimum.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't get where ##\frac {2+s}{2}## comes from. I know that since ##s < 2##, then
##s + 2 < 2 + 2## so ##s + 2 < 4## so ##\frac {s+2}{2} < 2##. But how do we know ## s < \frac {s+2}{2} ##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fishturtle1 said:
how do we know ## s < \frac {s+2}{2} ##
##s=\frac{s+s}2<\frac{s+2}2## because ##0<s<2##.
 
andrewkirk said:
##s=\frac{s+s}2<\frac{s+2}2## because ##0<s<2##.
Thank you, now I get it
 
Ok, and to show minimum we would do this:

Suppose ##h## is a minimum of ##(0,2)##. Then ##0 < h < 2## by definition of minimum. But ##0 < \frac {h}{2} < h < 2##. Thus h is not a minimum, a contradiction. We conclude that ##(0,2)## does not have a minimum. []

note: for the minimum, we could have divided ##h## by any ##n > 0## and would have found another minimum.
 
fishturtle1 said:

Homework Statement


Give an example of a bounded set that has neither a maximum nor a minimum. (The proof below is given by the book).

We claim that the set ##(0,2)## is bounded and has neither a maximum nor a minimum.

Proof: For each ##x \epsilon (0,2)##, we know that ##0 < x < 2##. Therefore 0 is a lower bound of the set and 2 is an upper bound. Thus, (0,2) is bounded. To see that it has no maximum, suppose to the contrary that ##s## is a maximum of the set ##(0,2)##. Then, by definition of maximum, s must be in the set ##(0,2)##. But
##0 < s < \frac {2+s}{2} < 2## and therefore ##\frac {2+s}{2}## is in the set (0,2) and larger than s, a contradiction. In a similar fashion, you can check that there is no minimum.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't get where ##\frac {2+s}{2}## comes from. I know that since ##s < 2##, then
##s + 2 < 2 + 2## so ##s + 2 < 4## so ##\frac {s+2}{2} < 2##. But how do we know ## s < \frac {s+2}{2} ##

Sometimes visualization is helpful.

Draw a number line and mark the points x = 0 and x = 2 on it. The segment between these two marked points shows the region ##I = (0,2).## Now for any ##a \in I## the point ##b=(a+2)/2## is the mid-point of the segment from ##a## to ##2##, so lies between that segment's endpoints ##a## and ##2##.
 
Ray Vickson said:
Sometimes visualization is helpful.

Draw a number line and mark the points x = 0 and x = 2 on it. The segment between these two marked points shows the region ##I = (0,2).## Now for any ##a \in I## the point ##b=(a+2)/2## is the mid-point of the segment from ##a## to ##2##, so lies between that segment's endpoints ##a## and ##2##.
I will keep this in mind while going through this chapter, Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
12K
Replies
6
Views
2K