Proof of Convergence: ∑∞n=1 n/(3n + n2)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the convergence or divergence of the series ∑∞n=1 n/(3n + n²). Participants are examining the comparison test, particularly in relation to the Harmonic Series.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the reasoning behind establishing inequalities, specifically how to derive n/(3n + n²) ≥ n/(4n²) for proving divergence. There is also a discussion on the implications of manipulating denominators in fractions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their thoughts on the inequalities and the conditions under which they hold. Some have provided alternative expressions to illustrate their points, indicating a collaborative exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on understanding the conditions for the inequalities discussed, particularly for n > 1 and n ≥ 3, which are relevant to the convergence analysis.

Calu
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have been asked to prove the convergence or otherwise of ∑n=1 n/(3n + n2).

In the example solution, with the aim to prove divergence by comparison with the Harmonic Series, the lecturer has stated that n/(3n + n2) ≥ n/(4n2) = 1/4n and which diverges to +∞.

I was wondering how to arrive at the decision to write n/(3n + n2) ≥ n/(4n2) came from, and how I would arrive at a similar inequality in further examples.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calu said:

Homework Statement



I have been asked to prove the convergence or otherwise of ∑n=1 n/(3n + n2).

In the example solution, with the aim to prove divergence by comparison with the Harmonic Series, the lecturer has stated that n/(3n + n2) ≥ n/(4n2) = 1/4n and which diverges to +∞.

I was wondering how to arrive at the decision to write n/(3n + n2) ≥ n/(4n2) came from, and how I would arrive at a similar inequality in further examples.

For ##a,b,c,> 0## you have ##a/b > a/c## if ##b < c##. In other words, if you make the denominator bigger you make the fraction smaller. Of course, in this case you have ##3n + n^2 < 4 n^2## for ##n > 1## (when ##n < n^2##, so ##3n < 3 n^2##).
 
Ray Vickson said:
For ##a,b,c,> 0## you have ##a/b > a/c## if ##b < c##. In other words, if you make the denominator bigger you make the fraction smaller. Of course, in this case you have ##3n + n^2 < 4 n^2## for ##n > 1## (when ##n < n^2##, so ##3n < 3 n^2##).

I see, thank you very much.
 
A little simpler:
<br /> \dfrac n{n^2+3n} = \dfrac{n}{n(n+3)} = \dfrac{1}{n+3} \ge \dfrac 1 {2n}<br />
for n \ge 3
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K