Proof of least Squares estimators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving the least squares estimators (LSE) for linear regression by minimizing the sum of squared errors (SSE). The key formula discussed is S(b0, b1) = Σ(yi - (b0 + b1xi))2. Participants emphasize the importance of differentiating this function with respect to b0 and b1, setting the derivatives to zero, and verifying the second derivatives to confirm a minimum. This method establishes that ordinary least squares (OLS) minimizes the sum of squares function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear regression concepts
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly differentiation
  • Knowledge of ordinary least squares (OLS) methodology
  • Ability to interpret statistical notation and equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of least squares estimators in linear regression
  • Learn about the properties of OLS estimators and their efficiency
  • Explore the role of second derivatives in optimization problems
  • Investigate applications of least squares in real-world data analysis
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data analysts, and students studying regression analysis who seek to understand the mathematical foundations of least squares estimators and their applications in predictive modeling.

julion
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, long time lurker, first time poster!
Just having some trouble with something..Im probably just looking at it the wrong way, but I was wondering if anyone could help me with this..

Im trying to prove that by choosing b0 and b1 to minimize
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/7/partas.jpg
you obtain the least squares estimators, namely:
http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/3641/partbx.jpg

also just wondering how you can prove that OLS minimizes the sum of squares function.
I know it has something to do with second derivatives, but I am a bit stuck.
Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a standard maximization problem. Set up the sum of squared errors (SSE), differentiate with respect to beta, set to zero, solve for beta. For a maximum, verify that the second derivative at the beta value you found in the first step is negative.
 
julion said:
Hey guys, long time lurker, first time poster!
Just having some trouble with something..Im probably just looking at it the wrong way, but I was wondering if anyone could help me with this..

Im trying to prove that by choosing b0 and b1 to minimize
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/7/partas.jpg
you obtain the least squares estimators, namely:
http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/3641/partbx.jpg

also just wondering how you can prove that OLS minimizes the sum of squares function.
I know it has something to do with second derivatives, but I am a bit stuck.
Thanks!

could you expand how to do that with a little bit more help please?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Treat

<br /> S(b_0, b_1) = \sum_{i=1}^n \left(y_i - (b_0 + b_1 x_i)\right)^2<br />

as a function of b_0 and b_1, and solve this system of equations - the solutions will give the formulas for the estimates of slope and intercept.

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \frac{\partial S}{\partial b_0} &amp; = 0\\<br /> \frac{\partial S}{\partial b_1} &amp; = 0<br /> \end{align*}<br />
 
thanks :)
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
16K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K