Yet another epsilon-delta proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjgawp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the limit \(\lim_{x \to -\infty} \frac{2}{\sqrt{x^{4}+1}}=0\), which falls under the topic of epsilon-delta proofs in calculus. Participants are exploring the logical implications of the proof and addressing potential contradictions in the reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the logical flow of the proof, particularly the implications of the conditions set for \(\epsilon\) and \(x\). Some express confusion over the interpretation of absolute values and inequalities in the context of negative \(x\). Others are questioning the validity of certain statements made about the solution set and the conditions for \(N\).

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications on the epsilon-delta framework. Some have offered guidance on how to approach the proof, while others are still grappling with the foundational concepts and definitions involved. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the topic, and multiple interpretations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenges of epsilon-delta proofs, particularly when dealing with limits as \(x\) approaches negative infinity. There is mention of the need for clearer communication regarding mathematical expressions and the potential for confusion in the setup of the problem.

bjgawp
Messages
84
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that [tex]\lim_{x \to -\infty} \frac{2}{\sqrt{x^{4}+1}}=0\[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Preliminary Work
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/401/proofzr7.jpg

Before proceeding on with the proof, when we look at the last line there seems to be a logical problem. We know that [tex]\epsilon[/tex] > 0 and x < N < 0 . Thus, it seems counter-intuitive that x is greater than a positive expression but less than a negative. Just a guess but I think it has something to deal with the second last line involving the square root. Thanks in advance!

Edit: Are there any texts that you guys suggest for learning epsilon-delta proofs? The examples that we do in class seem to be repetitive but when it becomes more abstract and general, some ingenuinity is needed and I would like to see some of these proofs worked out. Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Should move this to calculus for better results and don't expect much. Delta-epsilon proof is a confusing topic
 
It sure is counterintuitive. How can you say that the solution set to |x|>C is C<x<-C? Don't you mean x<-C or x>C?? E.g. imagine C=2.
 
How do i get from the penultimate line to a solution for x? If I proceed:
x < [tex]\sqrt[4]{\frac{2}{\epsilon^{2}}-1}[/tex] and set N to that when we give the formal proof, this would contradict one of our initial statements that N < 0 since the expression [tex]\sqrt[4]{\frac{2}{\epsilon^{2}}-1}[/tex] must be positive. So I'm not sure what the solution set of x would be.
 
Last edited:
Can you use what you know about x<0? So from your next to last line, say
[tex]|x| >\sqrt[4]{\frac{2}{\epsilon}-1}[/tex]
[tex]-|x|<\sqrt[4]{\frac{2}{\epsilon}-1}< |x|[/tex], but you know that x=-|x|

Okay, I obviously need to work on my tex communication skills, but hopefully you can make sense of this.
 
Last edited:
Call C your fourth root expression. Yes, C is positive. You want |x|>C and x negative. You want x<-C. I don't see your 'contradictions'.
 
Ah it's all clicked in guys. So for the formal proof I'll set N = -C.

Edit: Sorry if I need to post another thread but just a quick question about a simpler proof.
Prove that [tex]\lim_{x \to -\infty} \frac{1}{x}=0[/tex]

In the solutions manual:
For x < 0, [tex]|\frac {1}{x}-0|=- \frac{1}{x}[/tex]. If [tex]\epsilon[/tex] > 0 is given, then [tex]- \frac {1}{x}< \epsilon[/tex] which means x < [tex]- \frac{1}{\epsilon}[/tex].

Take N = [tex]- \frac{1}{\epsilon}[/tex]. Then,

[tex]x < N[/tex]
[tex]x < -\frac{1}{\epsilon}[/tex]
[tex]|-\frac{1}{x} - 0| = -\frac{1}{x} < \epsilon[/tex]
So, [tex]\lim_{x \to -\infty} \frac{1}{x}=0[/tex]

My problem is with the initial statement claiming that [tex]|\frac {1}{x}-0|=- \frac{1}{x}[/tex]. I fail to see how this works as the absolute value of a function yields positive values, does it not? And wouldn't the proof work if we just made the condition that [tex]\frac{1}{x} < 0 < \epsilon[/tex] , implying that [tex]x < 0 < \frac{1}{\epsilon}[/tex]?

I apologize in advance if my train of thought isn't presented very clearly. Thanks again!
 
Again, your limit is as x approaches neg inf, so x is negative. So the absolute value |1/x -0| = -1/x is positive.
 
Also, since x<0, when you multiply both sides of 1/x < eps by x, the inequality flips. Does that make sense? You know that eps is positive and x is negative, so you can't say that 1/eps < x. Sorry for my lack of tex. I'm working on that.
 
  • #10
Ah It all fell into place. Thanks a lot klile82 and Dick!

I'll definitely be back with more ... XD
 
  • #11
Following Dick's advice and posting a new thread.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
The statement you want to prove doesn't make much sense. Could you post it exactly as stated? And I would suggest you start another thread with a new problem. You'll get a lot more attention that way. If I see an active thread with over 5 posts, I don't generally don't even check it. Figure the issue is in the process of being beaten to death. Or that the poster is so confused no one can help.
 
  • #13
Sure no problem. And i wrote the question wrong, sorry!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K