MHB Proof of Sets: Proving (i) and (ii)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mathick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Sets
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving two statements about power sets. It is concluded that statement (i), which claims that if Z = X ∪ Y, then P(Z) = P(X) ∪ P(Y), is false, as demonstrated by a counterexample. Conversely, statement (ii), asserting that if Z = X ∩ Y, then P(Z) = P(X) ∩ P(Y), is true, supported by logical reasoning about subset relationships. The participants agree on the validity of these conclusions based on their examples and proofs. Understanding these properties of power sets is essential in set theory.
Mathick
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
If $X$ is a set, then the power set $P(X)$ of a set is the set of all subsets of $X$.

I need to decide whether the following statements are true or false and prove it:
(i) If $Z = X \cup Y$ , then $P(Z) = P(X) \cup P(Y)$.

(ii) If $Z = X \cap Y$ , then $P(Z) = P(X) \cap P(Y)$.

By examples I think that (ii) is true but (i) is false. However, I have no idea how to prove it.

Note: Example which I used was: $X=\left\{a,b\right\}$ and $Y=\left\{b,c\right\}$.

(i) $Z = X \cup Y =\left\{a,b,c\right\}$ , so $P(Z) = \left\{\left\{\right\},\left\{a\right\},\left\{b\right\},\left\{c\right\},\left\{a,b\right\},\left\{a,c\right\},\left\{b,c\right\},\left\{a,b,c\right\}\right\}$ .

However, $P(X) \cup P(Y) = \left\{\left\{\right\},\left\{a\right\},\left\{b\right\},\left\{c\right\},\left\{a,b\right\},\left\{b,c\right\}\right\}$.

That's why I disagree with a statement (i).

(ii) $Z = X \cap Y =\left\{b\right\}$ , so $P(Z) = \left\{\left\{\right\},\left\{b\right\}\right\}$ . However, $P(X) \cap P(Y) = \left\{\left\{\right\},\left\{b\right\}\right\}$ as well.

That's why I think a statement (ii) is true.

I would be grateful for help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathick said:
That's why I disagree with a statement (i).
You are absolutely correct.

If $Z=X\cap Y$, then $A\subseteq Z\iff A\subseteq X\land A\subseteq Y$ for any $A$, which means that $A\in P(Z)\iff A\in P(X)\land A\in P(Y)\iff A\in P(X)\cap P(Y)$.
 
There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K