MHB Proof & Structures: Showing n≤0 for Prime/Composite Number

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnny009
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Structures
johnny009
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi There,

My apologies, there was an error...in a previous question, which I POSTED ....last week.

This question has now been withdrawn, & replaced with the following :

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

a) Show that if n ≤ 0, then n^2 - 14n + 40 is a composite number.

b) Determine, with explanation, all integer values of 'n' for which ...n^2 -14n + 40 is prime

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

any guidance on these issues.....will be fantastic!

Thanks a lot.

John
 
Physics news on Phys.org
johnny009 said:
a) show that if n ≤ 0, then n^2 - 14n + 40 is a composite number.

b) Determine, with explanation, all integer values of 'n' for which ...n^2 -14n + 40 is prime
Hint: Factorise the quadratic expression $n^2 - 14n + 40.$
 
If you have factorised $n^2 - 14n + 40$, then the only cases where this could represent a prime would be when one of the factors is $\pm1$ and the other factor is (plus or minus) a prime. Which values of $n$ give rise to those possibilities?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top