MHB Proof Using Induction: Discrete Maths Problem Solving

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryuna
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
Ryuna
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can someone help me solve the following problems from Discrete Maths, using induction to prove them
View attachment 2554
Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    5.2 KB · Views: 91
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB! :D

In the future, we ask that you post no more than two questions in a thread and that you show what you have tired so we know where you are stuck, and can best help.

I am assuming the first one is instead:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\left(3\cdot2^{k-1}\right)=3\left(2^n-1\right)$$

The first step is to demonstrate that the base case (for $n=1$) is true. Have you done that?
 
^Right, I'll keep that in mind.

And the case is true for n=1. These are practice questions for my exam and I was looking for key answers to use as indicators. I'll be back after trying more.

could you give me a hint on how to start with the last one?
 
Ryuna said:
...could you give me a hint on how to start with the last one?

Well, after showing the base case is true, you want to state your induction hypothesis. It appears to me that using the given recursion will be key to your induction step. I would write the recursion in terms of $n+1$, and see what can be done with that.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top