Propagation of uncertainty from wavenumber to wavelength

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the propagation of uncertainty when converting from wavenumber to wavelength, specifically addressing the relationship between standard deviation in wavenumber (Δk) and its effect on wavelength uncertainty (Δλ). It is established that the propagation is not simply 2π/Δk; rather, it involves a more complex relationship derived from the derivative of the wavelength with respect to wavenumber. The correct formula for this propagation is Δλ = (2π/k²)Δk, highlighting the inverse square relationship between wavenumber and wavelength uncertainty.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wavenumber and wavelength concepts
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, specifically derivatives
  • Familiarity with uncertainty propagation in measurements
  • Knowledge of physical constants, such as 2π
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of uncertainty propagation in physical measurements
  • Learn about derivatives and their applications in physics
  • Explore the relationship between wavenumber and wavelength in more detail
  • Review resources on measurement accuracy and instrument calibration
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students involved in experimental measurements and data analysis, particularly those working with optical properties and wave phenomena.

jbar18
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This is just a quick question. If wavenumber is a variable with some standard deviation Δk, how do I propagate this spread when converting from wavenumber to wavelength? Is it just 2π/Δk or is it more complex than that?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jbar18 said:
This is just a quick question. If wavenumber is a variable with some standard deviation Δk, how do I propagate this spread when converting from wavenumber to wavelength? Is it just 2π/Δk or is it more complex than that?
Its more complex than that! Think about it: with what you wrote, the worse your wavenumber measuring instrument, the better your knowledge of the wavelength?

Check out:
http://www.rit.edu/~w-uphysi/uncertainties/Uncertaintiespart2.html#muldiv

You can also get the same desult from a simple derivative:
$$
\frac{d \lambda}{d k} = -\frac{2 \pi}{k^2} \Rightarrow \Delta \lambda = \frac{2\pi}{k^2} \Delta k
$$
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K