Proton-electron mass ratio; changed? how much?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the proton-electron mass ratio, its potential deviations, and implications for the universe's fine-tuning. Participants explore the limits of this ratio's variability, referencing both theoretical and observational perspectives.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants state that the proton-electron mass ratio cannot deviate more than 1:10^37, while others challenge this assertion.
  • One participant mentions that scientists have observed a change in the ratio of "one hundred thousandth of a percent or less over the past 7 billion years," equating this to 10^-7.
  • Another participant questions whether the maximum deviation of the proton-electron mass ratio has been calculated and if it is less than 1%.
  • There is confusion regarding the notation of 1:10^37, with a participant seeking clarification on whether it refers to a large or small number.
  • One participant notes that the deviation is measured to half a part per billion, which they argue is not as precise as the 10^-37 figure mentioned by others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the maximum allowable deviation of the proton-electron mass ratio, with no consensus reached on the correct interpretation or value.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the definitions and interpretations of the numerical values discussed, as well as the precision of measurements versus theoretical limits.

tomn44
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
On the subject of our 'finely turned universe', I have read that the proton-electron mass ratio can not deviate more than 1:1037. In other readings, the allowable deviation was stated as 1% ("If the neutron were very slightly less massive, then it could not decay without energy input. If its mass were lower by 1%, then isolated protons would decay instead of neutrons, and very few atoms heavier than lithium could form."

Scientists using a Effelsberg 100-m radio telescope have determined that the ratio has changed "by only one hundred thousandth of a percent or less over the past 7 billion years"; alternatively, the change is written as 10^-7.

My question is: Is the change in the ratio (one hundred thousandth of a percent, 10^-7) greater or less than 1:1037?

[1:1037 is 1:10 to the 37th power]
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
tomn44 said:
On the subject of our 'finely turned universe', I have read that the proton-electron mass ratio can not deviate more than 1:1037.

[1:1037 is 1:10 to the 37th power]

I'm sorry, but that is simply not correct.
 
Has the maximum deviation of the protron-electron mass ratio been calculated? If so, what is it? Is it something less than 1%?
 
tomn44 said:
I have read

Where?

that the proton-electron mass ratio can not deviate more than 1:1037.

Do you mean 1037 (one thousand thirty-seven), or 1037 which is a really really really big number, or 10-37 which is a really really really small number?

(Tip: to write exponents correctly, highlight them with the mouse, then click the "x2" icon in the toolbar at the top of the message editor.)
 
My lack of physics/math background is showing.

The number would have to be small since the article I read was speaking on the subject of a finely tuned universe and how a slight deviation in the ratio would not support the creation of the universe as we know it.

This would seem to be the equation, 1:10-37.

Thanks, jtbell, for the tip.
 
tomn44 said:
Has the maximum deviation of the protron-electron mass ratio been calculated? If so, what is it? Is it something less than 1%?

It's measured, not calculated. And it's known to half a part per billion - which is precise, but nowhere near as precise as your 10-37. Since it's not known to 10-37, it's hard to argue that it's value matters at the level of 10-37.
 
If you can still recall where you read it (something I often struggle with) post the specific reference and you will almost certainly get more help understanding what you read.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K