MHB Prove by induction that the function is injective

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the function F: {0,1}^ω → ℝ, defined by F((a_n)_{n ∈ ω}) = ∑(2a_n/3^(n+1)), is injective. The proof uses induction to show that if F((a_n)_{n ∈ ω}) = F((b_n)_{n ∈ ω}), then the sequences (a_n) and (b_n) must be identical. It concludes that if ℝ were countable, it would imply that {0,1}^ω is also countable, leading to a contradiction. Thus, the injectivity of F supports the assertion that ℝ is uncountable. The argument effectively demonstrates the relationship between the injective function and the cardinality of the sets involved.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hi! (Wave)

The set $\mathbb{R}$ of real numbers is not countable.

Proof:

We define the function $F: \{0,1\}^{\omega} \to \mathbb{R}$ with the formula:

$$(a_n)_{n \in \omega} \in \{0,1\}^{\omega} \mapsto F((a_n)_{n \in \omega})=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{2a_n}{3^{n+1}}$$

Show that $F$ is 1-1 and thus if $\mathbb{R}$ is countable then the set $\{0,1\}^{\omega}$ would also be, that is a contradiction.So we pick $(a_n)_{n \in \omega}, (b_n)_{n \in \omega} \in \{0,1\}^{\omega}$ with $F((a_n)_{n \in \omega})=F((b_n)_{n \in \omega}) \Rightarrow \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{2a_n}{3^{n+1}}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{2b_n}{3^{n+1}}$We will show that it holds using induction.At the base case, we assume that $a_0 \neq b_0$, let $a_0=0, b_0=1$.
So we have $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{2a_n}{3^{n+1}}=\frac{2}{3}+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{2b_n}{3^{n+1}}$

How could we find a contradiction? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a proof that your function is injective:

syxyr9.png
 
johng said:
Here's a proof that your function is injective:

I see.. (Nod)
Like that we have shown that the function $F: \{ 0,1 \}^{\omega} \to \mathbb{R}$ with the formula $(a_n)_{n \in \omega} \in \{0,1\}^{\omega} \mapsto F((a_n)_{n \in \omega})=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{2a_n}{3^{n+1}}$ is injective.
Now we suppose that $\mathbb{R}$ is countable. That means that there is an injective function $g: \mathbb{R} \to \omega$.
Since $F: \{ 0,1 \}^{\omega} \to \mathbb{R}$ is injective, do we deduce that $g \circ F: \{0,1\}^{\omega} \to \omega$ is injective, that is a contradiction since then that would mean that $\{0,1\}^{\omega}$ is countable, i.e. that $\{0,1\}^{\omega} \sim \omega$ ? (Thinking)
 
There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K