MHB Prove by induction that the function is injective

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hi! (Wave)

The set $\mathbb{R}$ of real numbers is not countable.

Proof:

We define the function $F: \{0,1\}^{\omega} \to \mathbb{R}$ with the formula:

$$(a_n)_{n \in \omega} \in \{0,1\}^{\omega} \mapsto F((a_n)_{n \in \omega})=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{2a_n}{3^{n+1}}$$

Show that $F$ is 1-1 and thus if $\mathbb{R}$ is countable then the set $\{0,1\}^{\omega}$ would also be, that is a contradiction.So we pick $(a_n)_{n \in \omega}, (b_n)_{n \in \omega} \in \{0,1\}^{\omega}$ with $F((a_n)_{n \in \omega})=F((b_n)_{n \in \omega}) \Rightarrow \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{2a_n}{3^{n+1}}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{2b_n}{3^{n+1}}$We will show that it holds using induction.At the base case, we assume that $a_0 \neq b_0$, let $a_0=0, b_0=1$.
So we have $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{2a_n}{3^{n+1}}=\frac{2}{3}+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{2b_n}{3^{n+1}}$

How could we find a contradiction? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a proof that your function is injective:

syxyr9.png
 
johng said:
Here's a proof that your function is injective:

I see.. (Nod)
Like that we have shown that the function $F: \{ 0,1 \}^{\omega} \to \mathbb{R}$ with the formula $(a_n)_{n \in \omega} \in \{0,1\}^{\omega} \mapsto F((a_n)_{n \in \omega})=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{2a_n}{3^{n+1}}$ is injective.
Now we suppose that $\mathbb{R}$ is countable. That means that there is an injective function $g: \mathbb{R} \to \omega$.
Since $F: \{ 0,1 \}^{\omega} \to \mathbb{R}$ is injective, do we deduce that $g \circ F: \{0,1\}^{\omega} \to \omega$ is injective, that is a contradiction since then that would mean that $\{0,1\}^{\omega}$ is countable, i.e. that $\{0,1\}^{\omega} \sim \omega$ ? (Thinking)
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top