MHB Prove Geometric Sequence with $(a,b,c)$

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $a,\,b,\,c$ be non-zero real numbers such that $(ab+bc+ca)^3=abc(a+b+c)^3$. Prove that $a,\,b,\,c$ are terms of a geometric sequence.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Consider the monic polynomial $P(x)=x^3+mx^2+nx+p$, with roots $a,\,b,\,c$. Then by Viete's relations we have

$a+b+c=-m\\ab+bc+ca=n\\abc=-p$

The given equality yields $n^3=m^3p$. Hence, if $m\ne 0$, the equation $P(x)=0$ can be written as

$x^3+mx^2+nx+\dfrac{n^3}{m^3}=0$

$m^3x^3+m^4x^2+nm^3x+n^3=0$

Factor the left-hand side,

$(mx+n)(m^2x^2-mnx+n^2)+m^3x(mx+n)=(mx+n)(m^2x^2+(m^3-mn)x+n^2)$

It follows that one of the roots of $P$ is $x_1=-\dfrac{n}{m}$ and the other two satisfy the condition $x_2x_3=\dfrac{n^2}{m^2}$. We obtained $x_1^2=x_2x_3$, thus the roots are terms of a geometric sequence.

If $m=0$ then $n=0$ but in this case, the polynomial $x^3+p$ cannot have three real roots.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top