Prove: If N Is Pure, Then N Is a Direct Summand of M

  • Thread starter Thread starter mobe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    module
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving two key statements regarding pure submodules and direct summands in the context of D-modules. First, it establishes that if N is a direct summand of M, then N is pure. Second, it asserts that if D is a Principal Ideal Domain (P.I.D) and M is a finitely generated torsion module, then the purity of N implies that N is a direct summand of M. The discussion emphasizes the importance of solvability conditions for the equations ax = y in both N and M.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of D-modules and their properties
  • Knowledge of Principal Ideal Domains (P.I.D)
  • Familiarity with finitely generated torsion modules
  • Concept of direct sums and submodules in module theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of pure submodules in module theory
  • Learn about the structure of finitely generated modules over P.I.Ds
  • Explore the concept of direct summands and their implications
  • Investigate solvability conditions for linear equations in modules
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying module theory, particularly those focusing on D-modules and their applications in algebra.

mobe
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose M is a D_module and N is a submodule. N is called pure iff for any y \in N and a \in D ax = y is solvable in N iff it is solvable in M. N is a direct summand of M iff there is a submodule K with M = N \oplus K. Prove:
(1) If N is a direct summand, then N is pure.
(2) Suppose D is P.I.D and M is a finitely generated torsion module. IF N is pure, then N is a direct summand of M.

Homework Equations



I am not sure what it means for ax=y is solvable in M iff it is solvable in N

The Attempt at a Solution


(1) If M is a direct summand, then there is a submodule K with M = N \oplus K. Let's suppose that ax=y is solvable in M for y \in N and a \in D, then there is a z \in N such that az=y. To prove that N is pure, one needs to prove that z \in N. I do not know if this is what I am supposed to do and if so, I have no idea how to do it.
(2)Now D is a P.I.D and M is a finitely generated torsion module. Assume that N is pure. Let y \in N and a\in D, then we have z \in N such that az=y implies z \in M. I do not know how to show that there is a submodule K of M such that M = N \oplus K.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
when they say solvable in M(or N) they mean "has a solution in".
So you are to show that for any y in N and a in D, there is x in N s.t. ax = y if and only if there is z in M s.t. az = y.

So suppose N is a direct summand of M, so M = N + K (here "+" = direct sum) for some submodule K of M.

One direction is clear, if ax = y is solvable in N then it's solvable in M.

So suppose the equation ax = y is solvable in M, so there is a z in M s.t. az = y.
Now use the fact z is in M. (it's pretty straightforward, I had typed up the proof but I really think you can do this!)

Post again if you are stuck, goodluck!
 
Last edited:
I can see now how to do the first one, the other direction is proved using the fact that the intersection of N and K is trivial. Thanks!
For part (2): how do I show the existence of K? How does the assumption that D is a P.I.D change the problem?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K